IVLU vs. EWS
IVLU (iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF) and EWS (iShares MSCI Singapore ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVLU is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Index, while EWS is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Singapore Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVLU returned 11.63%/yr vs 7.88%/yr for EWS. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVLU charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWS.
Performance
IVLU vs. EWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVLU achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly higher than EWS's 5.96% return. Over the past 10 years, IVLU has outperformed EWS with an annualized return of 11.63%, while EWS has yielded a comparatively lower 7.88% annualized return.
IVLU
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 14.33%
- 1Y
- 35.32%
- 3Y*
- 23.53%
- 5Y*
- 14.06%
- 10Y*
- 11.63%
EWS
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 7.68%
- 1Y
- 18.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- 7.88%
IVLU vs. EWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVLU iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF | 12.96% | 46.09% | 6.76% | 20.07% | -5.73% | 15.60% | -4.50% | 15.60% | -15.10% | 23.10% |
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 5.96% | 31.35% | 22.10% | 6.15% | -9.80% | 5.47% | -8.47% | 14.54% | -11.34% | 34.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVLU and EWS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015 | 0.64 |
The correlation between IVLU and EWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVLU vs. EWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVLU
EWS
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
IVLU
EWS
Industrials
IVLU
EWS
Technology
IVLU
EWS
Healthcare
IVLU
EWS
-
Basic Materials
IVLU
EWS
-
Consumer Cyclical
IVLU
EWS
Consumer Defensive
IVLU
EWS
Energy
IVLU
EWS
-
Communication Services
IVLU
EWS
Utilities
IVLU
EWS
Real Estate
IVLU
EWS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVLU vs. EWS — Risk / Return Rank
IVLU
EWS
IVLU vs. EWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) and iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVLU | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.21 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 2.24 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.01 | 5.40 | +5.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVLU vs. EWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVLU drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, smaller than the maximum EWS drawdown of -75.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVLU and EWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVLU | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.85% | -75.13% | +33.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.69% | -7.82% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.48% | -16.34% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -29.06% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.85% | -40.84% | -1.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -2.77% | +2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.57% | -21.98% | +13.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 3.23% | -0.14% |
Volatility
IVLU vs. EWS - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) at 5.05%. This indicates that IVLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVLU | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 5.05% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.85% | 12.11% | +0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.65% | 15.24% | +0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 17.34% | -0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 18.04% | -0.38% |
IVLU vs. EWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVLU has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EWS's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVLU vs. EWS - Dividend Comparison
IVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than EWS's 3.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 3.87% | 4.10% | 4.28% | 6.50% | 2.56% | 6.00% | 2.68% | 4.70% | 4.21% | 3.46% | 3.96% | 4.20% |
IVLU iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF | 3.28% | 3.71% | 4.46% | 4.69% | 3.59% | 3.47% | 2.05% | 3.53% | 2.82% | 2.87% | 2.53% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVLU and EWS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVLU has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to EWS (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVLU dropped -41.85% vs EWS's -75.13%.
On 10-year performance, IVLU leads with 11.63% vs 7.88% for EWS. On fees, IVLU is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, EWS has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVLU has performed better with a 11.63% return vs 7.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVLU is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWS.
EWS has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 3.28% for IVLU.
IVLU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EWS is Asia Pacific Equities. IVLU tracks MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Index, while EWS tracks MSCI Singapore Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IVLU and 0.50% for EWS.
IVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVLU and EWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer