IVEP vs. IGF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IVEP (Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - IVEP tracks the Solactive Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure Index while IGF tracks the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVEP charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.

Performance

IVEP vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF (IVEP) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IVEP

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: -1.63%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IGF

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -1.85%
• YTD: 8.05%
• 6M: 7.91%
• 1Y: 15.30%
• 3Y*: 15.91%
• 5Y*: 10.15%
• 10Y*: 8.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVEP vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IVEP Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF	8.37%
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	-3.56%

Correlation

The correlation between IVEP and IGF is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026	0.60

Return for Risk

IVEP vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGF

IGF Risk / Return Rank: 44
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 39
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVEP vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF (IVEP) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IVEP	IGF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.62	0.24	+2.39

Drawdowns

IVEP vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVEP drawdown since its inception was -7.34%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVEP and IGF.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVEP	IGF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.34%	-58.33%	+50.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.87%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.28%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.83%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.31%	-4.43%	+1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.97%	-11.87%	+9.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.90%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IVEP	IGF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.68%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.59%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.29%	10.49%	+15.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.29%	13.99%	+12.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.29%	16.83%	+9.46%

IVEP vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVEP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVEP vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

IVEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	2.98%	3.23%	3.21%	3.36%	2.67%	2.42%	2.33%	3.27%	3.52%	2.95%	2.98%	3.25%
IVEP Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVEP and IGF in my portfolio?

IVEP and IGF have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IVEP or IGF?

On fees, IGF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVEP or IGF?

IGF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVEP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVEP or IGF?

IGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 0.00% for IVEP.

What is the main difference between IVEP and IGF?

IVEP tracks Solactive Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure Index, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Wedbush and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IVEP and 0.39% for IGF.