IVE vs. GCOW
IVE (iShares S&P 500 Value ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - IVE tracks the S&P 500 Value Index while GCOW tracks the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVE returned 11.76%/yr vs 9.91%/yr for GCOW. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCOW.
Performance
IVE vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVE achieves a 7.46% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 12.18% return. Over the past 10 years, IVE has outperformed GCOW with an annualized return of 11.76%, while GCOW has yielded a comparatively lower 9.91% annualized return.
IVE
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 7.74%
- 1Y
- 21.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 11.76%
GCOW
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 12.18%
- 6M
- 13.23%
- 1Y
- 27.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
IVE vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVE iShares S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.46% | 13.02% | 12.03% | 22.07% | -5.41% | 24.72% | 1.22% | 31.62% | -9.22% | 15.24% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 12.18% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | 5.49% | 14.58% | -4.33% | 17.81% | -7.99% | 20.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVE and GCOW is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016 | 0.76 |
The correlation between IVE and GCOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.76 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IVE vs. GCOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVE
GCOW
Technology
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
IVE
GCOW
Financial Services
IVE
GCOW
-
Healthcare
IVE
GCOW
Consumer Cyclical
IVE
GCOW
Industrials
IVE
GCOW
Consumer Defensive
IVE
GCOW
Energy
IVE
GCOW
Utilities
IVE
GCOW
Real Estate
IVE
GCOW
-
Basic Materials
IVE
GCOW
Communication Services
IVE
GCOW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVE vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank
IVE
GCOW
IVE vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVE | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.44 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 5.71 | -2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.10 | 15.05 | -1.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVE | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 2.52 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.92 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.61 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.59 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
IVE vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVE drawdown since its inception was -61.32%, which is greater than GCOW's maximum drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVE and GCOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVE | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.32% | -37.64% | -23.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.19% | -4.77% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.58% | -12.35% | -5.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.04% | -21.48% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.04% | -37.64% | +0.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -2.73% | +2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.10% | -5.84% | -4.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 1.81% | -0.19% |
Volatility
IVE vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE) is 2.00%, while Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that IVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVE | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.00% | 2.85% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.02% | 7.99% | -0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.79% | 10.81% | -1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 13.49% | +0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 16.20% | +0.76% |
IVE vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVE vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison
IVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than GCOW's 4.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.43% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% | 0.00% |
IVE iShares S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.52% | 1.61% | 2.04% | 1.65% | 2.10% | 1.81% | 2.37% | 2.11% | 2.74% | 2.12% | 2.26% | 2.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVE and GCOW have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GCOW has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to IVE (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVE dropped -61.32% vs GCOW's -37.64%.
On 10-year performance, IVE leads with 11.76% vs 9.91% for GCOW. On fees, IVE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IVE has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVE has performed better with a 11.76% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.
GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 1.52% for IVE.
IVE tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IVE and 0.60% for GCOW.
GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVE and GCOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer