PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVE vs. GCOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVE vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVE achieves a 7.46% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 12.18% return. Over the past 10 years, IVE has outperformed GCOW with an annualized return of 11.76%, while GCOW has yielded a comparatively lower 9.91% annualized return.


IVE

1D
-0.35%
1M
2.24%
YTD
7.46%
6M
7.74%
1Y
21.15%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
11.76%

GCOW

1D
-0.56%
1M
0.09%
YTD
12.18%
6M
13.23%
1Y
27.12%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
9.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVE vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVE
iShares S&P 500 Value ETF
7.46%13.02%12.03%22.07%-5.41%24.72%1.22%31.62%-9.22%15.24%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
12.18%27.34%3.52%13.95%5.49%14.58%-4.33%17.81%-7.99%20.71%

Correlation

The correlation between IVE and GCOW is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016

0.76

The correlation between IVE and GCOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.76 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IVE vs. GCOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVE
GCOW

Technology

19.6%
0.9%

Financial Services

15.2%

-

Healthcare

11.6%
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
4.6%

Industrials

10.7%
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

9.5%
17.1%

Energy

7.6%
24.4%

Utilities

4.6%
4.1%

Real Estate

3.5%

-

Basic Materials

3.4%
7.3%

Communication Services

3.3%
14.6%

Technology

IVE
19.6%
GCOW
0.9%

Financial Services

IVE
15.2%
GCOW

-

Healthcare

IVE
11.6%
GCOW
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IVE
11.0%
GCOW
4.6%

Industrials

IVE
10.7%
GCOW
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

IVE
9.5%
GCOW
17.1%

Energy

IVE
7.6%
GCOW
24.4%

Utilities

IVE
4.6%
GCOW
4.1%

Real Estate

IVE
3.5%
GCOW

-

Basic Materials

IVE
3.4%
GCOW
7.3%

Communication Services

IVE
3.3%
GCOW
14.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVE vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVE
IVE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
IVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

GCOW
GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVE vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVEGCOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.44

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

5.71

-2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.10

15.05

-1.95

IVE vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVE Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVE and GCOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVEGCOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.52

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.92

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.61

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.59

-0.19

Drawdowns

IVE vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVE drawdown since its inception was -61.32%, which is greater than GCOW's maximum drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVE and GCOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVEGCOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.32%

-37.64%

-23.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.19%

-4.77%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.58%

-12.35%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.04%

-21.48%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.04%

-37.64%

+0.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-2.73%

+2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.10%

-5.84%

-4.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.81%

-0.19%

Volatility

IVE vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE) is 2.00%, while Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that IVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVEGCOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

2.85%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.02%

7.99%

-0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.79%

10.81%

-1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.40%

13.49%

+0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

16.20%

+0.76%

IVE vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVE vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

IVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than GCOW's 4.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
4.43%4.06%5.14%5.28%4.39%4.23%4.12%4.40%3.94%2.79%1.95%0.00%
IVE
iShares S&P 500 Value ETF
1.52%1.61%2.04%1.65%2.10%1.81%2.37%2.11%2.74%2.12%2.26%2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVE and GCOW have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCOW has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to IVE (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVE dropped -61.32% vs GCOW's -37.64%.

On 10-year performance, IVE leads with 11.76% vs 9.91% for GCOW. On fees, IVE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IVE has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVE has performed better with a 11.76% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 1.52% for IVE.

IVE tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IVE and 0.60% for GCOW.

GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVE and GCOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer