IVAL vs. GVAL
IVAL (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF) and GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVAL is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while GVAL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVAL returned 8.01%/yr vs 10.76%/yr for GVAL. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVAL charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for GVAL.
Performance
IVAL vs. GVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVAL achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly lower than GVAL's 14.37% return. Over the past 10 years, IVAL has underperformed GVAL with an annualized return of 8.01%, while GVAL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.76% annualized return.
IVAL
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- YTD
- 13.29%
- 6M
- 16.64%
- 1Y
- 32.20%
- 3Y*
- 19.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 8.01%
GVAL
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 14.37%
- 6M
- 15.35%
- 1Y
- 39.69%
- 3Y*
- 26.42%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
IVAL vs. GVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF | 13.29% | 34.92% | -0.71% | 20.61% | -10.06% | -0.22% | -4.94% | 21.26% | -22.50% | 31.03% |
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 14.37% | 55.87% | 2.59% | 13.30% | -7.98% | 10.70% | -8.51% | 17.24% | -14.30% | 29.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVAL and GVAL is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2014 | 0.69 |
The correlation between IVAL and GVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVAL vs. GVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVAL
GVAL
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
IVAL
GVAL
Consumer Cyclical
IVAL
GVAL
Basic Materials
IVAL
GVAL
Energy
IVAL
GVAL
Consumer Defensive
IVAL
GVAL
Technology
IVAL
GVAL
Communication Services
IVAL
GVAL
Healthcare
IVAL
GVAL
-
Financial Services
IVAL
-
GVAL
Real Estate
IVAL
-
GVAL
Utilities
IVAL
-
GVAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVAL vs. GVAL — Risk / Return Rank
IVAL
GVAL
IVAL vs. GVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVAL | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.11 | 2.75 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.96 | 3.64 | -0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.49 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 3.47 | -0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.17 | 13.33 | -3.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVAL | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 2.75 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.72 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.56 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.35 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
IVAL vs. GVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.09%, roughly equal to the maximum GVAL drawdown of -46.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVAL and GVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVAL | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.09% | -46.82% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.24% | -11.50% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.92% | -15.72% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.01% | -30.83% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.09% | -46.82% | +0.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.94% | -1.24% | -1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.00% | -13.88% | +1.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 2.99% | +0.19% |
Volatility
IVAL vs. GVAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) is 3.82%, while Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that IVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVAL | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 5.10% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.00% | 12.72% | -0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.37% | 14.52% | +0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 18.46% | -0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 19.21% | -0.37% |
IVAL vs. GVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVAL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GVAL's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVAL vs. GVAL - Dividend Comparison
IVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than GVAL's 2.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 2.83% | 2.93% | 4.75% | 6.12% | 5.05% | 2.97% | 1.90% | 2.84% | 4.65% | 2.00% | 2.54% | 2.11% |
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF | 2.66% | 2.75% | 3.60% | 5.15% | 8.00% | 3.95% | 2.07% | 2.51% | 2.93% | 1.73% | 2.02% | 1.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVAL and GVAL have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GVAL has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to IVAL (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVAL dropped -46.09% vs GVAL's -46.82%.
On 10-year performance, GVAL leads with 10.76% vs 8.01% for IVAL. On fees, IVAL is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GVAL has performed better with a 10.76% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVAL is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for GVAL.
GVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.66% for IVAL.
IVAL is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GVAL is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IVAL and 0.64% for GVAL.
GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVAL and GVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer