IVAL vs. FDT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IVAL (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF) and FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. IVAL is actively managed, while FDT is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVAL returned 8.01%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for FDT. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVAL charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FDT.

Performance

IVAL vs. FDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVAL achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly lower than FDT's 25.50% return. Over the past 10 years, IVAL has underperformed FDT with an annualized return of 8.01%, while FDT has yielded a comparatively higher 10.91% annualized return.

IVAL

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 3.49%
• YTD: 13.29%
• 6M: 16.64%
• 1Y: 32.20%
• 3Y*: 19.90%
• 5Y*: 8.36%
• 10Y*: 8.01%

FDT

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 5.22%
• YTD: 25.50%
• 6M: 28.63%
• 1Y: 55.05%
• 3Y*: 30.08%
• 5Y*: 12.55%
• 10Y*: 10.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVAL vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF	13.29%	34.92%	-0.71%	20.61%	-10.06%	-0.22%	-4.94%	21.26%	-22.50%	31.03%
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund	25.50%	52.21%	6.97%	15.03%	-19.51%	11.43%	4.29%	16.82%	-19.98%	34.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IVAL and FDT is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2014	0.84

The correlation between IVAL and FDT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVAL vs. FDT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IVAL	FDT
Industrials	28.5%	34.0%
Consumer Cyclical	23.5%	11.5%
Basic Materials	21.2%	9.6%
Energy	11.6%	9.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.4%	2.8%
Technology	3.9%	8.1%
Communication Services	2.1%	2.7%
Healthcare	1.8%	1.4%
Financial Services	-	10.2%
Real Estate	-	5.3%
Utilities	-	5.2%

Return for Risk

IVAL vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVAL

IVAL Risk / Return Rank: 61
IVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
IVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
IVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 62
IVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
IVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 57

FDT

FDT Risk / Return Rank: 84
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVAL vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IVAL	FDT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	3.00	-0.89
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	3.85	-0.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.54	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	4.13	-1.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.17	16.12	-5.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IVAL vs. FDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the FDT Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVAL and FDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IVAL	FDT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11	3.00	-0.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.69	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	0.59	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.40	-0.05

Drawdowns

IVAL vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.09%, roughly equal to the maximum FDT drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVAL and FDT.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVAL	FDT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.09%	-46.10%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.24%	-13.41%	+2.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.92%	-14.29%	-0.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.01%	-33.18%	+2.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.09%	-46.10%	+0.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.94%	-1.59%	-1.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.00%	-10.78%	-1.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.18%	3.43%	-0.25%

Volatility

IVAL vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) is 3.82%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that IVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVAL	FDT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.82%	7.23%	-3.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.00%	15.91%	-3.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.37%	18.42%	-3.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.74%	18.23%	-0.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.84%	18.52%	+0.32%

IVAL vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVAL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVAL vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison

IVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than FDT's 2.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund	2.84%	3.27%	3.89%	4.36%	2.29%	3.80%	2.42%	2.78%	2.13%	1.57%	1.76%	1.83%
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF	2.66%	2.75%	3.60%	5.15%	8.00%	3.95%	2.07%	2.51%	2.93%	1.73%	2.02%	1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVAL and FDT in my portfolio?

IVAL and FDT have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVAL or FDT?

FDT has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to IVAL (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVAL dropped -46.09% vs FDT's -46.10%.

Which ETF is better, IVAL or FDT?

On 10-year performance, FDT leads with 10.91% vs 8.01% for IVAL. On fees, IVAL is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVAL or FDT?

Over the 10-year period, FDT has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVAL or FDT?

IVAL is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVAL or FDT?

FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 2.66% for IVAL.

What is the main difference between IVAL and FDT?

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IVAL and 0.80% for FDT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.