IUVF.L vs. CATH
IUVF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS) and CATH (Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUVF.L is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while CATH is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Catholic Values Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUVF.L returned 16.97%/yr vs 13.84%/yr for CATH. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IUVF.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for CATH.
Performance
IUVF.L vs. CATH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUVF.L is traded in GBp, while CATH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CATH values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUVF.L achieves a 46.62% return, which is significantly higher than CATH's 10.26% return.
IUVF.L
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 16.86%
- YTD
- 46.62%
- 6M
- 49.54%
- 1Y
- 90.82%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 16.97%
- 10Y*
- —
CATH
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 26.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.09%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
IUVF.L vs. CATH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUVF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS | 46.62% | 23.92% | 8.23% | 8.28% | -4.63% | 31.29% | -5.36% | 22.90% | -7.17% | 10.45% |
CATH Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF | 10.26% | 8.74% | 25.50% | 19.85% | -10.44% | 30.09% | 15.32% | 25.67% | -0.21% | 12.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUVF.L and CATH is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2016 | 0.46 |
IUVF.L vs. CATH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUVF.L
CATH
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
IUVF.L
CATH
Financial Services
IUVF.L
CATH
Healthcare
IUVF.L
CATH
Consumer Cyclical
IUVF.L
CATH
Communication Services
IUVF.L
CATH
Industrials
IUVF.L
CATH
Consumer Defensive
IUVF.L
CATH
Energy
IUVF.L
CATH
Utilities
IUVF.L
CATH
Real Estate
IUVF.L
CATH
Basic Materials
IUVF.L
CATH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUVF.L vs. CATH — Risk / Return Rank
IUVF.L
CATH
IUVF.L vs. CATH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS (IUVF.L) and Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUVF.L | CATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.05 | 1.42 | +0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.82 | 3.00 | +12.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 61.43 | 10.51 | +50.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUVF.L | CATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.93 | 2.23 | +3.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 0.83 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.84 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
IUVF.L vs. CATH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUVF.L drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, which is greater than CATH's maximum drawdown of -26.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUVF.L and CATH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUVF.L | CATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.83% | -26.04% | -5.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.71% | -8.78% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -22.32% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.13% | -22.32% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | 0.00% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.67% | -3.66% | -2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 2.50% | -1.03% |
Volatility
IUVF.L vs. CATH - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS (IUVF.L) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) at 2.47%. This indicates that IUVF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CATH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUVF.L | CATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.56% | 2.47% | +4.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.10% | 8.39% | +3.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.24% | 11.82% | +3.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 16.74% | -0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.43% | 18.62% | -0.19% |
IUVF.L vs. CATH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUVF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CATH's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUVF.L vs. CATH - Dividend Comparison
IUVF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CATH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CATH Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF | 0.76% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 1.16% | 1.34% | 1.03% | 1.23% | 0.68% | 2.01% | 1.27% | 0.50% |
IUVF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUVF.L and CATH have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUVF.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUVF.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for CATH.
IUVF.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while CATH is S&P 500. IUVF.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while CATH tracks S&P 500 Catholic Values Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUVF.L and 0.29% for CATH.
Find the right allocation for IUVF.L and CATH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer