IUSV vs. SCHV
IUSV (iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - IUSV tracks the S&P 900 Value Index while SCHV tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUSV returned 11.73%/yr vs 11.18%/yr for SCHV. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
IUSV vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSV achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 16.63% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IUSV having a 11.73% annualized return and SCHV not far behind at 11.18%.
IUSV
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- 6M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 18.63%
- 3Y*
- 14.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.41%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
SCHV
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- YTD
- 16.63%
- 1Y
- 24.62%
- 3Y*
- 17.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.18%
IUSV vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF | 9.97% | 12.85% | 12.18% | 21.73% | -5.40% | 25.22% | 1.56% | 31.47% | -9.21% | 15.09% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 16.63% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | -7.65% | 25.58% | 2.64% | 25.92% | -7.30% | 16.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSV and SCHV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009 | 0.96 |
The correlation between IUSV and SCHV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
IUSV vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUSV
SCHV
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
IUSV
SCHV
Financial Services
IUSV
SCHV
Consumer Cyclical
IUSV
SCHV
Healthcare
IUSV
SCHV
Industrials
IUSV
SCHV
Consumer Defensive
IUSV
SCHV
Energy
IUSV
SCHV
Utilities
IUSV
SCHV
Real Estate
IUSV
SCHV
Basic Materials
IUSV
SCHV
Communication Services
IUSV
SCHV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSV vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank
IUSV
SCHV
IUSV vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUSV | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.39 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 3.62 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.19 | 14.40 | -3.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUSV vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSV drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, which is greater than SCHV's maximum drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSV and SCHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSV | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.88% | -37.08% | -19.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.36% | -6.83% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.76% | -15.26% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.95% | -19.78% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.54% | -37.08% | -0.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -1.78% | +1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -3.81% | -2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 1.71% | -0.04% |
Volatility
IUSV vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) is 2.58%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that IUSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSV | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.58% | 4.06% | -1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.29% | 8.83% | -1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.03% | 11.26% | -1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 14.55% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 16.92% | +0.06% |
IUSV vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IUSV and SCHV have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUSV vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison
IUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than SCHV's 1.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF | 1.67% | 1.78% | 2.15% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 1.87% | 2.40% | 2.19% | 2.67% | 1.93% | 4.44% | 7.63% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSV and SCHV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHV has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to IUSV (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSV dropped -56.88% vs SCHV's -37.08%.
On 10-year performance, IUSV leads with 11.73% vs 11.18% for SCHV. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, IUSV has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IUSV has performed better with a 11.73% return vs 11.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSV and SCHV have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.
SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 1.67% for IUSV.
IUSV tracks S&P 900 Value Index, while SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab.
SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IUSV and SCHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer