IUSG vs. SPIT
IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) and SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. IUSG is passively managed, while SPIT is actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUSG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SPIT.
Performance
IUSG vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSG achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly lower than SPIT's 27.82% return.
IUSG
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 24.74%
- 3Y*
- 24.87%
- 5Y*
- 13.64%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
SPIT
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 18.85%
- YTD
- 27.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUSG vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 12.43% | 1.89% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 27.82% | 5.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSG and SPIT is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSG vs. SPIT — Risk / Return Rank
IUSG
SPIT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IUSG vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUSG | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.48 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUSG vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSG drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than SPIT's maximum drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSG and SPIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSG | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.41% | -12.49% | -50.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -5.04% | +2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.36% | -2.52% | -18.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | — | — |
Volatility
IUSG vs. SPIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSG | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.12% | 26.32% | -9.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 26.32% | -5.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 26.32% | -5.84% |
IUSG vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUSG vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison
IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than SPIT's 5.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.49% | 0.53% | 0.59% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.64% | 1.32% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.29% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 5.62% | 7.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSG and SPIT have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.
SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.62%, compared with 0.49% for IUSG.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSG and 0.89% for SPIT.
Find the right allocation for IUSG and SPIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer