PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSG vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSG vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSG achieves a 14.00% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 3.97% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSG has outperformed SLV with an annualized return of 17.82%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively lower 15.63% annualized return.


IUSG

1D
-0.07%
1M
6.40%
YTD
14.00%
6M
13.31%
1Y
33.47%
3Y*
27.62%
5Y*
15.67%
10Y*
17.82%

SLV

1D
1.16%
1M
1.62%
YTD
3.97%
6M
29.40%
1Y
113.72%
3Y*
45.73%
5Y*
21.04%
10Y*
15.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSG vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
14.00%21.23%34.70%29.28%-28.81%31.26%32.65%30.62%-0.79%27.02%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
3.97%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSG and SLV is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006

0.21

IUSG vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUSG
SLV

Technology

48.0%

-

Communication Services

17.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%

-

Financial Services

8.8%

-

Industrials

7.5%

-

Healthcare

6.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.0%

-

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Basic Materials

0.5%
100.0%

Utilities

0.5%

-

Energy

0.2%

-

Technology

IUSG
48.0%
SLV

-

Communication Services

IUSG
17.1%
SLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

IUSG
9.3%
SLV

-

Financial Services

IUSG
8.8%
SLV

-

Industrials

IUSG
7.5%
SLV

-

Healthcare

IUSG
6.2%
SLV

-

Consumer Defensive

IUSG
1.0%
SLV

-

Real Estate

IUSG
0.9%
SLV

-

Basic Materials

IUSG
0.5%
SLV
100.0%

Utilities

IUSG
0.5%
SLV

-

Energy

IUSG
0.2%
SLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSG vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSG
IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSG vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUSGSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.36

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

2.69

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.95

5.76

+5.19

IUSG vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSG Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSG and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUSGSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

1.94

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.58

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.49

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.25

+0.14

Drawdowns

IUSG vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSG drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSG and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSGSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.41%

-76.28%

+12.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-42.45%

+29.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.28%

-42.45%

+20.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.21%

-42.45%

+10.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.35%

-42.81%

+10.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-36.57%

+35.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.44%

-44.67%

+23.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

19.81%

-16.75%

Volatility

IUSG vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) is 4.22%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.34%. This indicates that IUSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSGSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

16.34%

-12.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

58.31%

-46.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.71%

58.90%

-43.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.86%

36.15%

-15.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.40%

31.83%

-11.43%

IUSG vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUSG vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
0.47%0.53%0.59%1.12%1.07%0.59%0.93%1.64%1.32%1.28%1.48%1.29%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUSG and SLV have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.34%) compared to IUSG (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSG dropped -63.41% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.82% vs 15.63% for SLV. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSG has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.82% return vs 15.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

IUSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

IUSG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SLV is Silver. IUSG tracks Russell 3000 Growth Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSG and 0.50% for SLV.

IUSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSG and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer