IUSG vs. SGRT
IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. IUSG is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUSG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
IUSG vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSG achieves a 14.08% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 51.46% return.
IUSG
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 14.08%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 33.89%
- 3Y*
- 27.59%
- 5Y*
- 15.69%
- 10Y*
- 17.88%
SGRT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 14.68%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 56.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUSG vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 14.08% | 8.57% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 51.46% | 25.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSG and SGRT is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSG vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
IUSG
SGRT
IUSG vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUSG | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.09 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUSG | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 3.81 | -3.42 |
Drawdowns
IUSG vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSG drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSG and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSG | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.41% | -17.87% | -45.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | 0.00% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.44% | -3.11% | -18.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | — | — |
Volatility
IUSG vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSG | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.72% | 33.41% | -17.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 33.41% | -12.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 33.41% | -13.01% |
IUSG vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUSG vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.53% | 0.59% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.64% | 1.32% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.29% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSG and SGRT have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.
IUSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.
Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSG and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for IUSG and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer