IUSG vs. QARP
IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - IUSG tracks the S&P 900 Growth Index while QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUSG returned 13.54%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for QARP. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUSG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.
Performance
IUSG vs. QARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSG achieves a 11.16% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 12.78% return.
IUSG
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- 6M
- 10.32%
- YTD
- 11.16%
- 1Y
- 22.91%
- 3Y*
- 24.15%
- 5Y*
- 13.54%
- 10Y*
- 17.23%
QARP
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- —
IUSG vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 11.16% | 21.23% | 34.70% | 29.28% | -28.81% | 31.26% | 32.65% | 30.62% | -2.58% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 12.78% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 14.83% | 30.70% | -5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSG and QARP is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018 | 0.86 |
The correlation between IUSG and QARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUSG vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUSG
QARP
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
IUSG
QARP
Communication Services
IUSG
QARP
Financial Services
IUSG
QARP
Consumer Cyclical
IUSG
QARP
Healthcare
IUSG
QARP
Industrials
IUSG
QARP
Utilities
IUSG
QARP
Consumer Defensive
IUSG
QARP
Real Estate
IUSG
QARP
Basic Materials
IUSG
QARP
Energy
IUSG
QARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSG vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank
IUSG
QARP
IUSG vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUSG | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.43 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 3.46 | -1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.90 | 15.38 | -8.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUSG vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSG drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than QARP's maximum drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSG and QARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSG | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.41% | -35.44% | -27.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -7.26% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.28% | -15.65% | -6.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.21% | -22.75% | -9.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | 0.00% | -3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.36% | -4.39% | -16.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 1.63% | +1.70% |
Volatility
IUSG vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that IUSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSG | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.58% | 2.76% | +2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.13% | 8.22% | +5.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.21% | 10.58% | +6.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.12% | 15.54% | +5.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 19.55% | +0.93% |
IUSG vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUSG vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison
IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than QARP's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.59% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.64% | 1.32% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.29% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSG and QARP have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IUSG has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSG dropped -63.41% vs QARP's -35.44%.
On 5-year performance, IUSG leads with 13.54% vs 12.09% for QARP. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 13.54% return vs 12.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QARP.
QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.50% for IUSG.
IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSG and 0.19% for QARP.
QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IUSG and QARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer