PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSG vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSG vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IUSG having a 12.72% return and ITOT slightly lower at 12.18%. Over the past 10 years, IUSG has outperformed ITOT with an annualized return of 17.20%, while ITOT has yielded a comparatively lower 14.61% annualized return.


IUSG

1D
2.17%
1M
1.92%
6M
11.50%
YTD
12.72%
1Y
24.41%
3Y*
25.35%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
17.20%
ALL TIME*
8.19%

ITOT

1D
1.46%
1M
1.37%
6M
9.88%
YTD
12.18%
1Y
23.59%
3Y*
20.38%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
14.61%
ALL TIME*
10.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$218.20M$235.22M$304.20M
$105.73M$92.27M$99.82M

IUSG vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
12.72%21.23%34.70%29.28%-28.81%31.26%32.65%30.62%-0.79%27.02%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
12.18%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-5.33%21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSG and ITOT is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2004

0.95

The correlation between IUSG and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUSG vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUSG
ITOT

Technology

50.9%
36.4%

Communication Services

14.9%
9.1%

Financial Services

8.6%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
9.5%

Industrials

7.7%
9.9%

Healthcare

6.5%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
4.3%

Real Estate

0.8%
2.3%

Basic Materials

0.5%
1.9%

Utilities

0.4%
2.2%

Energy

0.2%
3.1%

Technology

IUSG
50.9%
ITOT
36.4%

Communication Services

IUSG
14.9%
ITOT
9.1%

Financial Services

IUSG
8.6%
ITOT
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IUSG
8.5%
ITOT
9.5%

Industrials

IUSG
7.7%
ITOT
9.9%

Healthcare

IUSG
6.5%
ITOT
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

IUSG
1.0%
ITOT
4.3%

Real Estate

IUSG
0.8%
ITOT
2.3%

Basic Materials

IUSG
0.5%
ITOT
1.9%

Utilities

IUSG
0.4%
ITOT
2.2%

Energy

IUSG
0.2%
ITOT
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSG vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IUSG
IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IUSG vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUSGITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.32

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

2.66

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.96

11.42

-4.46

IUSG vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSG Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSG and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUSG vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSG drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than ITOT's maximum drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSG and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSGITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.41%

-55.20%

-8.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-8.90%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.28%

-19.44%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.21%

-25.36%

-6.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.35%

-35.00%

+2.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

0.00%

-2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.33%

-6.93%

-14.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

2.07%

+1.45%

Volatility

IUSG vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 3.80%. This indicates that IUSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSGITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.24%

3.80%

+2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.68%

10.35%

+4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.84%

13.11%

+4.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.22%

17.48%

+3.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.55%

18.28%

+2.27%

IUSG vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUSG vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than ITOT's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.99%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
0.49%0.53%0.59%1.12%1.07%0.59%0.93%1.64%1.32%1.28%1.48%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, IUSG and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IUSG has higher volatility (6.24%) compared to ITOT (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSG dropped -63.41% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.20% vs 14.61% for ITOT. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.20% return vs 14.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for IUSG.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.49% for IUSG.

IUSG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSG and 0.03% for ITOT.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSG and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer