PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSG vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSG vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with IUSG at 9.19% and DGRO at 9.19%. Over the past 10 years, IUSG has outperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 17.77%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.62% annualized return.


IUSG

1D
-2.31%
1M
-1.86%
YTD
9.19%
6M
7.87%
1Y
26.96%
3Y*
25.00%
5Y*
13.77%
10Y*
17.77%

DGRO

1D
0.32%
1M
0.80%
YTD
9.19%
6M
8.52%
1Y
22.22%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
13.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSG vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
9.19%21.23%34.70%29.28%-28.81%31.26%32.65%30.62%-0.79%27.02%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
9.19%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSG and DGRO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between IUSG and DGRO has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IUSG vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUSG
DGRO

Technology

50.8%
22.0%

Communication Services

15.2%
0.1%

Financial Services

8.7%
20.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
5.4%

Industrials

6.6%
10.4%

Healthcare

6.4%
16.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
11.1%

Utilities

1.1%
6.4%

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Basic Materials

0.5%
2.4%

Energy

0.3%
5.1%

Technology

IUSG
50.8%
DGRO
22.0%

Communication Services

IUSG
15.2%
DGRO
0.1%

Financial Services

IUSG
8.7%
DGRO
20.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IUSG
8.4%
DGRO
5.4%

Industrials

IUSG
6.6%
DGRO
10.4%

Healthcare

IUSG
6.4%
DGRO
16.5%

Consumer Defensive

IUSG
1.2%
DGRO
11.1%

Utilities

IUSG
1.1%
DGRO
6.4%

Real Estate

IUSG
0.8%
DGRO

-

Basic Materials

IUSG
0.5%
DGRO
2.4%

Energy

IUSG
0.3%
DGRO
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSG vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSG
IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSG vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUSGDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.42

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

3.45

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.45

13.31

-4.86

IUSG vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSG Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSG and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUSG vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSG drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSG and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSGDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.41%

-35.10%

-28.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-6.47%

-6.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.28%

-14.03%

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.21%

-19.31%

-12.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.35%

-35.10%

+2.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.23%

-0.90%

-4.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.40%

-3.43%

-17.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

1.67%

+1.53%

Volatility

IUSG vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.63%. This indicates that IUSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSGDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.16%

2.63%

+4.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.66%

6.94%

+6.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.92%

9.53%

+7.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.06%

13.80%

+7.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.48%

16.60%

+3.88%

IUSG vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUSG vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than DGRO's 1.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.97%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
0.50%0.53%0.59%1.12%1.07%0.59%0.93%1.64%1.32%1.28%1.48%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUSG and DGRO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IUSG has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to DGRO (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSG dropped -63.41% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.77% vs 13.62% for DGRO. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.77% return vs 13.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.50% for IUSG.

IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSG and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSG and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer