IUSG vs. ACWI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUSG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 3000 Growth Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUSG returned 17.88%/yr vs 12.85%/yr for ACWI. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUSG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.

Performance

IUSG vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSG achieves a 14.08% return, which is significantly higher than ACWI's 12.13% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSG has outperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 17.88%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively lower 12.85% annualized return.

IUSG

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: 7.35%
• YTD: 14.08%
• 6M: 13.91%
• 1Y: 33.89%
• 3Y*: 27.59%
• 5Y*: 15.69%
• 10Y*: 17.88%

ACWI

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: 12.13%
• 6M: 12.96%
• 1Y: 29.18%
• 3Y*: 21.15%
• 5Y*: 11.28%
• 10Y*: 12.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSG vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF	14.08%	21.23%	34.70%	29.28%	-28.81%	31.26%	32.65%	30.62%	-0.79%	27.02%
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	12.13%	22.41%	17.45%	22.27%	-18.39%	18.66%	16.34%	26.59%	-9.19%	24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSG and ACWI is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008	0.90

The correlation between IUSG and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUSG vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IUSG	ACWI
Technology	48.0%	29.4%
Communication Services	17.1%	9.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	9.3%
Financial Services	8.8%	16.1%
Industrials	7.5%	10.9%
Healthcare	6.2%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.0%	5.0%
Real Estate	0.9%	1.8%
Basic Materials	0.5%	3.7%
Utilities	0.5%	2.6%
Energy	0.2%	4.2%

Return for Risk

IUSG vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSG

IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 59
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 60
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 61

ACWI

ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 66
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSG vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IUSG	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	2.29	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	3.17	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.41	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	3.01	-0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.09	13.53	-2.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IUSG vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSG Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSG and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IUSG	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	2.29	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.71	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88	0.75	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.43	-0.04

Drawdowns

IUSG vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSG drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than ACWI's maximum drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSG and ACWI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IUSG	ACWI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.41%	-56.00%	-7.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.07%	-9.73%	-3.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.28%	-16.55%	-5.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.21%	-26.42%	-5.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.35%	-33.53%	+1.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.98%	-0.83%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.44%	-8.61%	-12.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.06%	2.16%	+0.90%

Volatility

IUSG vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 3.93%. This indicates that IUSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IUSG	ACWI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.23%	3.93%	+0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.23%	10.29%	+1.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.72%	12.78%	+2.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.87%	16.05%	+4.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.40%	17.11%	+3.29%

IUSG vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

IUSG vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than ACWI's 1.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	1.38%	1.55%	1.70%	1.88%	1.79%	1.71%	1.43%	2.33%	2.18%	1.94%	2.19%	2.56%
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF	0.47%	0.53%	0.59%	1.12%	1.07%	0.59%	0.93%	1.64%	1.32%	1.28%	1.48%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IUSG and ACWI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, IUSG and ACWI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IUSG or ACWI?

IUSG has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to ACWI (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSG dropped -63.41% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

Which ETF is better, IUSG or ACWI?

On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.88% vs 12.85% for ACWI. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IUSG or ACWI?

Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.88% return vs 12.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IUSG or ACWI?

IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IUSG or ACWI?

ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.47% for IUSG.

What is the main difference between IUSG and ACWI?

IUSG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. IUSG tracks Russell 3000 Growth Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSG and 0.32% for ACWI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.