PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUS6.DE vs. CWB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IUS6.DE vs. CWB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Euro Covered Bond UCITS ETF (IUS6.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IUS6.DE vs. CWB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUS6.DE
iShares Euro Covered Bond UCITS ETF
-0.26%2.11%2.85%5.72%-13.52%-2.13%1.63%2.67%-0.09%0.70%
CWB
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF
5.64%2.77%17.33%11.06%-15.90%9.82%40.74%25.16%2.60%1.48%
Different Trading Currencies

IUS6.DE is traded in EUR, while CWB is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CWB values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUS6.DE achieves a -0.26% return, which is significantly lower than CWB's 5.64% return. Over the past 10 years, IUS6.DE has underperformed CWB with an annualized return of -0.15%, while CWB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.02% annualized return.


IUS6.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
-0.26%
6M
-0.09%
1Y
1.27%
3Y*
3.00%
5Y*
-1.11%
10Y*
-0.15%

CWB

1D
1.05%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
5.64%
6M
3.55%
1Y
14.32%
3Y*
11.07%
5Y*
4.27%
10Y*
11.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IUS6.DE vs. CWB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUS6.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CWB's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IUS6.DE vs. CWB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUS6.DE
IUS6.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IUS6.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUS6.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUS6.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
IUS6.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUS6.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

CWB
CWB Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWB Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWB Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUS6.DE vs. CWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Covered Bond UCITS ETF (IUS6.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUS6.DECWBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.54

0.87

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.75

1.23

-0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.17

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

1.50

-0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.56

4.77

-2.20

IUS6.DE vs. CWB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUS6.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the CWB Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUS6.DE and CWB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUS6.DECWBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

0.87

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

0.33

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

0.74

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.84

-0.52

Correlation

The correlation between IUS6.DE and CWB is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IUS6.DE vs. CWB - Dividend Comparison

IUS6.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than CWB's 1.62% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUS6.DE
iShares Euro Covered Bond UCITS ETF
2.17%2.03%1.51%0.90%0.29%0.26%0.35%0.47%0.60%0.64%0.97%0.62%
CWB
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF
1.62%1.69%1.85%1.97%2.21%1.97%2.34%3.03%6.17%4.25%4.60%7.52%

Drawdowns

IUS6.DE vs. CWB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUS6.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, smaller than the maximum CWB drawdown of -32.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUS6.DE and CWB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IUS6.DECWBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.47%

-32.06%

+15.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.22%

-7.52%

+5.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.57%

-28.41%

+12.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.47%

-32.06%

+15.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.88%

-3.06%

-3.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-6.22%

+2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

2.28%

-1.75%

Volatility

IUS6.DE vs. CWB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Euro Covered Bond UCITS ETF (IUS6.DE) is 1.07%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that IUS6.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IUS6.DECWBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

5.41%

-4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.70%

11.60%

-9.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36%

16.63%

-14.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.79%

13.18%

-9.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.14%

15.01%

-11.87%