PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUS4.DE vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUS4.DE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist) (IUS4.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUS4.DE is traded in EUR, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUS4.DE achieves a 19.30% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 3.58% return. Over the past 10 years, IUS4.DE has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 8.07%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.41% annualized return.


IUS4.DE

1D
0.76%
1M
2.78%
YTD
19.30%
6M
19.76%
1Y
34.48%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
8.07%

SCHG

1D
-1.16%
1M
-3.35%
YTD
3.58%
6M
2.33%
1Y
17.33%
3Y*
20.51%
5Y*
14.14%
10Y*
18.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUS4.DE vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUS4.DE
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist)
19.30%15.97%9.46%9.42%-7.68%5.35%-2.08%21.73%-13.13%15.52%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
3.58%3.56%43.86%45.60%-27.58%37.70%27.67%39.09%3.27%12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IUS4.DE and SCHG is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009

0.41

The correlation between IUS4.DE and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUS4.DE vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUS4.DE
IUS4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IUS4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUS4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUS4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IUS4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUS4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUS4.DE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist) (IUS4.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUS4.DESCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.20

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

1.11

+2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.73

3.17

+8.56

IUS4.DE vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUS4.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUS4.DE and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUS4.DE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUS4.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.61%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUS4.DE and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUS4.DESCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.61%

-31.88%

-19.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.11%

-15.64%

+5.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.92%

-28.18%

+15.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.46%

-30.34%

+8.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.62%

-31.88%

-0.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-5.31%

+5.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.06%

-5.23%

-9.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

5.48%

-2.55%

Volatility

IUS4.DE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist) (IUS4.DE) is 3.82%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that IUS4.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUS4.DESCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

5.14%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.84%

11.64%

+2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.24%

16.25%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.97%

22.05%

-7.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.92%

21.90%

-5.98%

IUS4.DE vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUS4.DE has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUS4.DE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

IUS4.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than SCHG's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUS4.DE
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.62%1.88%1.70%1.77%2.10%1.47%1.60%1.45%1.41%1.31%1.15%0.70%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.40%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUS4.DE and SCHG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for IUS4.DE.

IUS4.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IUS4.DE tracks MSCI Japan Small Cap, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for IUS4.DE and 0.04% for SCHG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUS4.DE and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer