PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUES.L vs. MLPQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUES.L vs. MLPQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUES.L is traded in USD, while MLPQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MLPQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUES.L achieves a 30.45% return, which is significantly higher than MLPQ.L's 18.65% return. Over the past 10 years, IUES.L has outperformed MLPQ.L with an annualized return of 9.21%, while MLPQ.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.97% annualized return.


IUES.L

1D
-0.36%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
30.45%
6M
29.22%
1Y
46.28%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
20.33%
10Y*
9.21%

MLPQ.L

1D
-0.50%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
18.65%
6M
14.71%
1Y
15.68%
3Y*
18.74%
5Y*
17.29%
10Y*
6.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUES.L vs. MLPQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUES.L
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
30.45%9.82%3.87%-0.63%63.84%51.95%-33.35%8.81%-18.12%-1.19%
MLPQ.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF
18.65%2.66%22.56%18.90%31.70%37.39%-31.51%8.01%-15.08%-8.97%

Correlation

The correlation between IUES.L and MLPQ.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2015

0.69

The correlation between IUES.L and MLPQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUES.L vs. MLPQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUES.L
MLPQ.L

Energy

100.0%
96.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

3.2%

Energy

IUES.L
100.0%
MLPQ.L
96.7%

Basic Materials

IUES.L

-

MLPQ.L

-

Communication Services

IUES.L

-

MLPQ.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

IUES.L

-

MLPQ.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IUES.L

-

MLPQ.L

-

Financial Services

IUES.L

-

MLPQ.L

-

Healthcare

IUES.L

-

MLPQ.L

-

Industrials

IUES.L

-

MLPQ.L
0.2%

Real Estate

IUES.L

-

MLPQ.L

-

Technology

IUES.L

-

MLPQ.L

-

Utilities

IUES.L

-

MLPQ.L
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUES.L vs. MLPQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUES.L
IUES.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IUES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IUES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPQ.L
MLPQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MLPQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUES.L vs. MLPQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUES.LMLPQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.18

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

1.94

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.97

4.92

+5.05

IUES.L vs. MLPQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUES.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the MLPQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUES.L and MLPQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUES.LMLPQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.04

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.84

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.25

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.15

+0.16

Drawdowns

IUES.L vs. MLPQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUES.L drawdown since its inception was -66.78%, smaller than the maximum MLPQ.L drawdown of -82.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUES.L and MLPQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUES.LMLPQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.78%

-82.34%

+15.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.49%

-8.06%

-6.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.90%

-17.57%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.98%

-21.57%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.78%

-75.81%

+9.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.45%

-3.44%

-4.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.21%

-28.24%

+14.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.63%

3.18%

+1.45%

Volatility

IUES.L vs. MLPQ.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L) at 5.62%. This indicates that IUES.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUES.LMLPQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.13%

5.62%

+2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.58%

12.03%

+6.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.81%

15.07%

+6.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.72%

20.48%

+6.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.49%

28.38%

+0.11%

IUES.L vs. MLPQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUES.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPQ.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUES.L vs. MLPQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUES.L nor MLPQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUES.L and MLPQ.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUES.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUES.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPQ.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUES.L and 0.50% for MLPQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUES.L and MLPQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer