IUCM.L vs. EIMI.L
IUCM.L (iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc) and EIMI.L (iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUCM.L is a Communications Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD, while EIMI.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUCM.L returned 11.39%/yr vs 7.61%/yr for EIMI.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUCM.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EIMI.L.
Performance
IUCM.L vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUCM.L achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than EIMI.L's 24.25% return.
IUCM.L
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 20.87%
- 3Y*
- 27.10%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- —
EIMI.L
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 24.25%
- 6M
- 27.21%
- 1Y
- 49.41%
- 3Y*
- 23.30%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.26%
IUCM.L vs. EIMI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUCM.L iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc | 1.60% | 26.48% | 38.98% | 55.75% | -40.54% | 22.36% | 22.64% | 30.83% | -10.96% |
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 24.25% | 32.16% | 7.36% | 11.03% | -19.67% | -0.65% | 18.80% | 16.37% | -5.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUCM.L and EIMI.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IUCM.L and EIMI.L has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IUCM.L vs. EIMI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUCM.L
EIMI.L
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
IUCM.L
EIMI.L
Technology
IUCM.L
EIMI.L
Basic Materials
IUCM.L
-
EIMI.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUCM.L
-
EIMI.L
Consumer Defensive
IUCM.L
-
EIMI.L
Energy
IUCM.L
-
EIMI.L
Financial Services
IUCM.L
-
EIMI.L
Healthcare
IUCM.L
-
EIMI.L
Industrials
IUCM.L
-
EIMI.L
Real Estate
IUCM.L
-
EIMI.L
Utilities
IUCM.L
-
EIMI.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUCM.L vs. EIMI.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUCM.L
EIMI.L
IUCM.L vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUCM.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.47 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 3.88 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.78 | 14.02 | -6.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUCM.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 2.56 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.42 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.36 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
IUCM.L vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUCM.L drawdown since its inception was -47.32%, which is greater than EIMI.L's maximum drawdown of -38.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUCM.L and EIMI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUCM.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.32% | -38.73% | -8.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | -12.66% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.79% | -17.44% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.32% | -35.50% | -11.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.70% | -2.64% | -2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.21% | -14.04% | +3.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 3.52% | -0.85% |
Volatility
IUCM.L vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) is 4.40%, while iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that IUCM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUCM.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 8.18% | -3.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.34% | 16.71% | -6.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.28% | 19.23% | -4.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.96% | 18.31% | +1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.34% | 19.15% | +1.19% |
IUCM.L vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUCM.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUCM.L vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUCM.L nor EIMI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUCM.L and EIMI.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUCM.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUCM.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EIMI.L.
IUCM.L is categorized as Communications Equities, while EIMI.L is Emerging Markets Equities. IUCM.L tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD, while EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUCM.L and 0.18% for EIMI.L.
Find the right allocation for IUCM.L and EIMI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer