IUCM.L vs. XWTS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L).
IUCM.L and XWTS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IUCM.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. It was launched on Sep 17, 2018. XWTS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. It was launched on Mar 16, 2016. Both IUCM.L and XWTS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IUCM.L or XWTS.L.
Performance
IUCM.L vs. XWTS.L - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUCM.L achieves a 33.14% return, which is significantly higher than XWTS.L's 28.89% return.
IUCM.L
33.14%
4.87%
13.24%
39.19%
13.55%
N/A
XWTS.L
28.89%
2.62%
10.50%
35.72%
11.40%
N/A
Key characteristics
| IUCM.L | XWTS.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.60 | 2.39 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.64 | 3.34 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.48 | 1.45 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.08 | 1.75 |
| Martin Ratio | 14.77 | 14.06 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.65% | 2.53% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.01% | 14.83% |
| Max Drawdown | -47.32% | -44.71% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.61% | -1.86% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IUCM.L vs. XWTS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUCM.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XWTS.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between IUCM.L and XWTS.L is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IUCM.L vs. XWTS.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IUCM.L vs. XWTS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUCM.L nor XWTS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IUCM.L vs. XWTS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUCM.L drawdown since its inception was -47.32%, which is greater than XWTS.L's maximum drawdown of -44.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUCM.L and XWTS.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IUCM.L vs. XWTS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L) have volatilities of 4.99% and 4.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.