ITWO vs. AMDW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ITWO (Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. ITWO is passively managed, while AMDW is actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ITWO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.

Performance

ITWO vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITWO achieves a 19.23% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 181.57% return.

ITWO

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: 3.76%
• YTD: 19.23%
• 6M: 17.25%
• 1Y: 41.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDW

• 1D: -3.70%
• 1M: 58.72%
• YTD: 181.57%
• 6M: 177.88%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITWO vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ITWO Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF	19.23%	9.08%
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	181.57%	34.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ITWO and AMDW is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025	0.50

Return for Risk

ITWO vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITWO

ITWO Risk / Return Rank: 70
ITWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
ITWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
ITWO Omega Ratio Rank: 59
ITWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
ITWO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITWO vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ITWO	AMDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.24	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.28	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ITWO	AMDW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.08	4.53	-3.45

Drawdowns

ITWO vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITWO drawdown since its inception was -24.77%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITWO and AMDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	ITWO	AMDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.77%	-34.64%	+9.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.70%	+3.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.14%	-14.61%	+9.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ITWO	AMDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.81%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.42%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.61%	81.51%	-62.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.48%	81.51%	-61.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.48%	81.51%	-61.03%

ITWO vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITWO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

ITWO vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

ITWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.47%, less than AMDW's 30.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	30.10%	34.78%	0.00%
ITWO Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF	7.47%	12.12%	4.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ITWO and AMDW in my portfolio?

ITWO and AMDW have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ITWO or AMDW?

On fees, ITWO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ITWO or AMDW?

ITWO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ITWO or AMDW?

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 30.10%, compared with 7.47% for ITWO.

What is the main difference between ITWO and AMDW?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ITWO and 0.99% for AMDW.