PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITT vs. INVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ITT vs. INVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ITT Inc. (ITT) and Innoviva, Inc. (INVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITT achieves a 15.29% return, which is significantly higher than INVA's 13.41% return. Over the past 10 years, ITT has outperformed INVA with an annualized return of 21.05%, while INVA has yielded a comparatively lower 8.19% annualized return.


ITT

1D
1.23%
1M
2.37%
YTD
15.29%
6M
12.81%
1Y
33.17%
3Y*
33.00%
5Y*
18.75%
10Y*
21.05%

INVA

1D
0.80%
1M
0.93%
YTD
13.41%
6M
13.41%
1Y
7.95%
3Y*
21.53%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
8.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITT vs. INVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITT
ITT Inc.
15.29%22.52%20.86%48.91%-19.50%33.95%5.47%54.60%-8.66%40.06%
INVA
Innoviva, Inc.
13.41%15.22%8.17%21.06%-23.19%39.23%-12.50%-18.85%22.97%32.62%

Correlation

The correlation between ITT and INVA is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2004

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between ITT and INVA has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ITT:

$17.49B

INVA:

$1.92B

EPS

ITT:

$5.58

INVA:

$5.94

PE Ratio

ITT:

35.72

INVA:

3.82

PEG Ratio

ITT:

2.51

INVA:

0.02

PS Ratio

ITT:

3.86

INVA:

4.54

PB Ratio

ITT:

3.69

INVA:

1.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

ITT:

$4.24B

INVA:

$424.12M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ITT:

$1.50B

INVA:

$323.16M

EBITDA (TTM)

ITT:

$793.20M

INVA:

$438.91M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITT vs. INVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITT
ITT Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ITT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITT Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ITT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITT Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

INVA
INVA Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
INVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
INVA Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
INVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
INVA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITT vs. INVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ITT Inc. (ITT) and Innoviva, Inc. (INVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ITTINVADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.08

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

0.39

+1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.93

0.92

+4.01

ITT vs. INVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITT Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is higher than the INVA Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITT and INVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITT vs. INVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITT drawdown since its inception was -74.46%, smaller than the maximum INVA drawdown of -84.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITT and INVA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITTINVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.46%

-84.32%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.73%

-20.32%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.09%

-23.53%

-5.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.97%

-47.01%

+9.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.52%

-59.57%

+10.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.95%

-29.11%

+19.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.95%

-44.68%

+25.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.74%

8.85%

-2.11%

Volatility

ITT vs. INVA - Volatility Comparison

ITT Inc. (ITT) has a higher volatility of 9.11% compared to Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) at 6.62%. This indicates that ITT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITTINVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.11%

6.62%

+2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.53%

17.05%

+5.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.38%

28.92%

+1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.20%

27.29%

+1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.95%

33.86%

-1.91%

Dividends

ITT vs. INVA - Dividend Comparison

ITT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while INVA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INVA
Innoviva, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.12%
ITT
ITT Inc.
0.74%0.81%0.89%0.97%1.30%0.86%0.88%0.80%1.11%0.96%1.29%1.30%

Financials

ITT vs. INVA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ITT Inc. and Innoviva, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
1.21B
97.99M
(ITT) Total Revenue
(INVA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ITT and INVA have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITT has higher volatility (9.11%) compared to INVA (6.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITT dropped -74.46% vs INVA's -84.32%.

ITT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITT and INVA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer