INVA vs. DT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) and Dynatrace, Inc. (DT).

Performance

INVA vs. DT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) and Dynatrace, Inc. (DT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

INVA vs. DT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
INVA Innoviva, Inc.	17.11%	15.22%	8.17%	21.06%	-23.19%	39.23%	-12.50%	20.10%
DT Dynatrace, Inc.	-15.16%	-20.26%	-0.62%	42.79%	-36.54%	39.47%	71.03%	6.08%

Fundamentals

Market Cap INVA : $2.00B DT : $11.15B
EPS INVA : $3.19 DT : $0.90
PE Ratio INVA : 7.33 DT : 40.88
PEG Ratio INVA : 0.03 DT : 0.51
PS Ratio INVA : 4.83 DT : 5.78
PB Ratio INVA : 1.70 DT : 4.06
Total Revenue (TTM) INVA : $411.33M DT : $1.93B
Gross Profit (TTM) INVA : $307.67M DT : $1.58B
EBITDA (TTM) INVA : $203.88M DT : $283.91M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INVA achieves a 17.11% return, which is significantly higher than DT's -15.16% return.

INVA

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 2.54%
• YTD: 17.11%
• 6M: 28.84%
• 1Y: 30.49%
• 3Y*: 27.67%
• 5Y*: 14.38%
• 10Y*: 6.20%

DT

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: -15.16%
• 6M: -23.89%
• 1Y: -23.12%
• 3Y*: -4.56%
• 5Y*: -5.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

INVA vs. DT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INVA

INVA Risk / Return Rank: 71
INVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
INVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
INVA Omega Ratio Rank: 70
INVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
INVA Martin Ratio Rank: 66

DT

DT Risk / Return Rank: 17
DT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
DT Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
DT Omega Ratio Rank: 15
DT Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
DT Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INVA vs. DT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) and Dynatrace, Inc. (DT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INVA	DT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	-0.65	+1.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	-0.75	+2.71
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	0.90	+0.32
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	-0.54	+1.78
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.96	-1.11	+4.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INVA vs. DT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INVA Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the DT Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INVA and DT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INVA	DT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	-0.65	+1.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	-0.15	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.15	-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between INVA and DT is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

INVA vs. DT - Dividend Comparison

Neither INVA nor DT has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INVA Innoviva, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	7.12%
DT Dynatrace, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

INVA vs. DT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INVA drawdown since its inception was -84.32%, which is greater than DT's maximum drawdown of -61.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVA and DT.

Drawdown Indicators

	INVA	DT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.32%	-61.77%	-22.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.53%	-40.91%	+17.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.01%	-61.77%	+14.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.80%	-53.31%	+26.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.79%	-30.15%	-14.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.85%	19.78%	-9.93%

Volatility

INVA vs. DT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) is 6.02%, while Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) has a volatility of 11.21%. This indicates that INVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INVA	DT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.02%	11.21%	-5.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.63%	25.73%	-4.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.15%	35.63%	-7.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.88%	39.95%	-12.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.05%	46.22%	-12.17%

Financials