PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INVA vs. DT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INVA vs. DT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) and Dynatrace, Inc. (DT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INVA achieves a 6.80% return, which is significantly higher than DT's 3.76% return.


INVA

1D
-0.74%
1M
-7.62%
YTD
6.80%
6M
1.76%
1Y
6.01%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
6.63%

DT

1D
1.12%
1M
19.57%
YTD
3.76%
6M
0.16%
1Y
-16.43%
3Y*
-5.10%
5Y*
-2.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INVA vs. DT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
INVA
Innoviva, Inc.
6.80%15.22%8.17%21.06%-23.19%39.23%-12.50%20.10%
DT
Dynatrace, Inc.
3.76%-20.26%-0.62%42.79%-36.54%39.47%71.03%6.08%

Correlation

The correlation between INVA and DT is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019

0.14

The correlation between INVA and DT shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INVA:

$1.81B

DT:

$13.44B

EPS

INVA:

$5.94

DT:

$0.73

PE Ratio

INVA:

3.59

DT:

61.46

PEG Ratio

INVA:

0.02

DT:

0.85

PS Ratio

INVA:

4.27

DT:

6.74

PB Ratio

INVA:

1.25

DT:

5.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

INVA:

$424.12M

DT:

$2.02B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INVA:

$323.16M

DT:

$1.65B

EBITDA (TTM)

INVA:

$438.91M

DT:

$289.14M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INVA vs. DT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INVA
INVA Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
INVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
INVA Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
INVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
INVA Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

DT
DT Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
DT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
DT Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
DT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
DT Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INVA vs. DT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) and Dynatrace, Inc. (DT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INVADTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.21

-0.42

+0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.59

-0.35

+0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.95

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

-0.39

+0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.90

-0.70

+1.60

INVA vs. DT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INVA Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the DT Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INVA and DT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INVADTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

-0.42

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

-0.05

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.21

-0.16

Drawdowns

INVA vs. DT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INVA drawdown since its inception was -84.32%, which is greater than DT's maximum drawdown of -61.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVA and DT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INVADTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.32%

-61.77%

-22.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.53%

-42.87%

+19.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.53%

-48.16%

+24.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.01%

-61.77%

+14.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.24%

-42.90%

+9.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.66%

-30.68%

-13.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.15%

23.95%

-13.80%

Volatility

INVA vs. DT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) is 6.99%, while Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) has a volatility of 19.49%. This indicates that INVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INVADTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

19.49%

-12.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.86%

33.17%

-16.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.94%

39.27%

-10.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.28%

40.83%

-13.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.89%

46.57%

-12.68%

Dividends

INVA vs. DT - Dividend Comparison

Neither INVA nor DT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DT
Dynatrace, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INVA
Innoviva, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.12%

Financials

INVA vs. DT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Innoviva, Inc. and Dynatrace, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
97.99M
531.72M
(INVA) Total Revenue
(DT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


INVA and DT have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DT has higher volatility (19.49%) compared to INVA (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INVA dropped -84.32% vs DT's -61.77%.

INVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INVA and DT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer