PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INVA vs. OCUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INVA vs. OCUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) and Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. (OCUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INVA achieves a 4.90% return, which is significantly higher than OCUL's -32.70% return. Over the past 10 years, INVA has underperformed OCUL with an annualized return of 5.03%, while OCUL has yielded a comparatively higher 6.96% annualized return.


INVA

1D
-1.18%
1M
-6.01%
6M
4.85%
YTD
4.90%
1Y
12.56%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
5.03%
ALL TIME*
1.79%

OCUL

1D
-3.54%
1M
-15.25%
6M
-10.61%
YTD
-32.70%
1Y
-31.46%
3Y*
23.00%
5Y*
-5.79%
10Y*
6.96%
ALL TIME*
-3.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$12.98M$16.47M$18.69M
$16.61M$18.92M$24.77M

INVA vs. OCUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INVA
Innoviva, Inc.
4.90%15.22%8.17%21.06%-23.19%39.23%-12.50%-18.85%22.97%32.62%
OCUL
Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.
-32.70%42.15%91.48%58.72%-59.68%-66.33%424.05%-0.75%-10.56%-46.83%

Correlation

The correlation between INVA and OCUL is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2014

0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INVA:

$1.55B

OCUL:

$1.79B

EPS

INVA:

$5.93

OCUL:

-$1.38

PS Ratio

INVA:

4.20

OCUL:

33.02

PB Ratio

INVA:

1.23

OCUL:

3.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

INVA:

$424.12M

OCUL:

$52.04M

Gross Profit (TTM)

INVA:

$323.16M

OCUL:

$45.40M

EBITDA (TTM)

INVA:

$438.91M

OCUL:

-$283.03M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INVA vs. OCUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

INVA
INVA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
INVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
INVA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
INVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
INVA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

OCUL
OCUL Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
OCUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCUL Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
OCUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCUL Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

INVA vs. OCUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) and Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. (OCUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INVAOCULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.97

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

-0.52

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.78

-0.88

+2.66

INVA vs. OCUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INVA Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is higher than the OCUL Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INVA and OCUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INVA vs. OCUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INVA drawdown since its inception was -84.32%, smaller than the maximum OCUL drawdown of -95.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVA and OCUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INVAOCULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.32%

-95.19%

+10.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.32%

-57.29%

+36.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.53%

-61.57%

+38.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.01%

-82.77%

+35.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.57%

-90.94%

+31.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.43%

-81.12%

+46.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.61%

-76.62%

+32.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.69%

33.51%

-24.82%

Volatility

INVA vs. OCUL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) is 6.96%, while Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. (OCUL) has a volatility of 14.69%. This indicates that INVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OCUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INVAOCULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

14.69%

-7.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.49%

54.04%

-35.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.31%

69.97%

-40.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.44%

78.48%

-51.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.55%

78.42%

-44.87%

Dividends

INVA vs. OCUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither INVA nor OCUL has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INVA
Innoviva, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.12%
OCUL
Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

INVA vs. OCUL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Innoviva, Inc. and Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


INVA and OCUL have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OCUL has higher volatility (14.69%) compared to INVA (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INVA dropped -84.32% vs OCUL's -95.19%.

INVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INVA and OCUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer