PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INVA vs. TMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INVA vs. TMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) and TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INVA achieves a 17.81% return, which is significantly higher than TMC's -21.88% return.


INVA

1D
3.88%
1M
4.85%
YTD
17.81%
6M
20.71%
1Y
13.11%
3Y*
23.08%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
8.60%

TMC

1D
-2.63%
1M
-10.74%
YTD
-21.88%
6M
-34.06%
1Y
-26.52%
3Y*
49.94%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INVA vs. TMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
INVA
Innoviva, Inc.
17.81%15.22%8.17%21.06%-23.19%9.87%
TMC
TMC the metals company Inc.
-21.88%450.89%1.82%42.86%-62.98%-81.18%

Correlation

The correlation between INVA and TMC is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2021

0.08

The correlation between INVA and TMC shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INVA:

$2.00B

TMC:

$1.55T

EPS

INVA:

$5.94

TMC:

-$0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

INVA:

$424.12M

TMC:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

INVA:

$323.16M

TMC:

-$136.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

INVA:

$438.91M

TMC:

-$296.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INVA vs. TMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INVA
INVA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
INVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
INVA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
INVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
INVA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

TMC
TMC Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
TMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMC Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
TMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMC Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INVA vs. TMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) and TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INVATMCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.03

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

-0.43

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.53

-0.69

+2.21

INVA vs. TMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INVA Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is higher than the TMC Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INVA and TMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INVA vs. TMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INVA drawdown since its inception was -84.32%, smaller than the maximum TMC drawdown of -95.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVA and TMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INVATMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.32%

-95.58%

+11.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.32%

-61.65%

+41.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.53%

-74.56%

+51.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.36%

-61.29%

+34.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.68%

-79.33%

+34.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.67%

38.77%

-30.10%

Volatility

INVA vs. TMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) is 7.58%, while TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC) has a volatility of 23.30%. This indicates that INVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INVATMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.58%

23.30%

-15.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.45%

66.93%

-49.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.12%

96.87%

-67.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.34%

112.96%

-85.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.79%

112.96%

-79.17%

Dividends

INVA vs. TMC - Dividend Comparison

Neither INVA nor TMC has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INVA
Innoviva, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.12%
TMC
TMC the metals company Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

INVA vs. TMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Innoviva, Inc. and TMC the metals company Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M20222023202420252026
97.99M
0
(INVA) Total Revenue
(TMC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


INVA and TMC have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMC has higher volatility (23.30%) compared to INVA (7.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INVA dropped -84.32% vs TMC's -95.58%.

INVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INVA and TMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer