ITPG.L vs. INXG.L
ITPG.L (iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) and INXG.L (iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITPG.L is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the BBG US Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index (USD), while INXG.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg UK Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ITPG.L returned -0.13%/yr vs -9.01%/yr for INXG.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ITPG.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for INXG.L.
Performance
ITPG.L vs. INXG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITPG.L achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly higher than INXG.L's -1.18% return.
ITPG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 2.96%
- 3Y*
- 3.32%
- 5Y*
- -0.13%
- 10Y*
- —
INXG.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- 6M
- -2.90%
- YTD
- -1.18%
- 1Y
- 2.64%
- 3Y*
- -1.20%
- 5Y*
- -9.01%
- 10Y*
- -2.20%
ITPG.L vs. INXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITPG.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 0.96% | 6.20% | 1.89% | 2.58% | -13.77% | 6.17% | 10.05% | 6.89% | -1.16% |
INXG.L iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF | -1.18% | 1.10% | -8.60% | 0.16% | -34.28% | 4.03% | 11.12% | 6.25% | 1.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITPG.L and INXG.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2018 | 0.43 |
The correlation between ITPG.L and INXG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITPG.L vs. INXG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ITPG.L
INXG.L
ITPG.L vs. INXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (ITPG.L) and iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITPG.L | INXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.05 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 0.40 | +1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.86 | 0.90 | +2.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITPG.L vs. INXG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITPG.L drawdown since its inception was -16.78%, smaller than the maximum INXG.L drawdown of -50.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITPG.L and INXG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITPG.L | INXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.78% | -50.86% | +34.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.85% | -6.59% | +4.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.74% | -15.06% | +10.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.78% | -50.86% | +34.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.83% | -43.74% | +39.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -12.09% | +6.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 2.93% | -2.16% |
Volatility
ITPG.L vs. INXG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (ITPG.L) is 0.98%, while iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L) has a volatility of 2.44%. This indicates that ITPG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITPG.L | INXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | 2.44% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.83% | 7.14% | -4.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.39% | 9.66% | -5.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.38% | 20.07% | -13.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.35% | 17.39% | -11.04% |
ITPG.L vs. INXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITPG.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than INXG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ITPG.L vs. INXG.L - Dividend Comparison
ITPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, less than INXG.L's 7.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INXG.L iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF | 7.65% | 7.23% | 5.77% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.61% | 1.36% | 1.95% | 1.28% | 0.65% | 1.94% |
ITPG.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 4.66% | 4.56% | 4.62% | 1.50% | 1.24% | 1.09% | 2.03% | 2.79% | 1.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITPG.L and INXG.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, INXG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
INXG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for ITPG.L.
ITPG.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while INXG.L is Government Bonds. ITPG.L tracks BBG US Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index (USD), while INXG.L tracks Bloomberg UK Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ITPG.L and 0.10% for INXG.L.
Find the right allocation for ITPG.L and INXG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer