PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITOT vs. EUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITOT vs. EUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITOT achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly lower than EUSA's 10.06% return. Over the past 10 years, ITOT has outperformed EUSA with an annualized return of 15.35%, while EUSA has yielded a comparatively lower 12.28% annualized return.


ITOT

1D
0.08%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
8.95%
6M
7.49%
1Y
22.95%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
11.85%
10Y*
15.35%

EUSA

1D
0.43%
1M
1.53%
YTD
10.06%
6M
8.62%
1Y
17.88%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
7.65%
10Y*
12.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITOT vs. EUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
8.95%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-5.33%21.37%
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
10.06%10.24%14.64%17.72%-17.13%25.60%15.03%30.56%-8.58%19.02%

Correlation

The correlation between ITOT and EUSA is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2010

0.83

The correlation between ITOT and EUSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ITOT vs. EUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ITOT
EUSA

Technology

37.2%
20.3%

Financial Services

11.4%
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
11.1%

Communication Services

9.8%
4.0%

Industrials

9.1%
15.3%

Healthcare

8.8%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
5.3%

Energy

3.3%
3.8%

Real Estate

2.3%
5.2%

Utilities

2.1%
5.4%

Basic Materials

2.0%
4.3%

Technology

ITOT
37.2%
EUSA
20.3%

Financial Services

ITOT
11.4%
EUSA
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ITOT
9.8%
EUSA
11.1%

Communication Services

ITOT
9.8%
EUSA
4.0%

Industrials

ITOT
9.1%
EUSA
15.3%

Healthcare

ITOT
8.8%
EUSA
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

ITOT
4.3%
EUSA
5.3%

Energy

ITOT
3.3%
EUSA
3.8%

Real Estate

ITOT
2.3%
EUSA
5.2%

Utilities

ITOT
2.1%
EUSA
5.4%

Basic Materials

ITOT
2.0%
EUSA
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITOT vs. EUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

EUSA
EUSA Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
EUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITOT vs. EUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ITOTEUSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.26

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

2.30

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.40

9.03

+2.37

ITOT vs. EUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the EUSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITOT and EUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITOT vs. EUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITOT drawdown since its inception was -55.20%, which is greater than EUSA's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITOT and EUSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITOTEUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.20%

-39.16%

-16.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-7.82%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-18.20%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-25.24%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-39.16%

+4.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

-0.62%

-2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-4.58%

-2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

1.99%

+0.03%

Volatility

ITOT vs. EUSA - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) at 3.67%. This indicates that ITOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITOTEUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

3.67%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.00%

9.09%

+0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.77%

12.04%

+0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.46%

16.99%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

18.32%

-0.05%

ITOT vs. EUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITOT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than EUSA's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ITOT vs. EUSA - Dividend Comparison

ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than EUSA's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
1.47%1.63%1.47%1.53%1.73%1.23%1.45%1.49%2.01%1.50%1.59%2.21%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
1.02%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITOT and EUSA have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITOT has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to EUSA (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITOT dropped -55.20% vs EUSA's -39.16%.

On 10-year performance, ITOT leads with 15.35% vs 12.28% for EUSA. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, EUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 15.35% return vs 12.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for EUSA.

EUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.02% for ITOT.

ITOT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EUSA is Mid Cap Blend Equities. ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index, while EUSA tracks MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for ITOT and 0.09% for EUSA.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITOT and EUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer