PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ITOT vs. ENFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ITOT vs. ENFR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ITOT returned 14.99%/yr vs 12.28%/yr for ENFR. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ITOT charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.

Performance

ITOT vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITOT achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 25.97% return. Over the past 10 years, ITOT has outperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 14.99%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively lower 12.28% annualized return.

ITOT

1D
0.59%
1M
0.46%
YTD
9.69%
6M
9.77%
1Y
24.78%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
14.99%

ENFR

1D
0.73%
1M
0.52%
YTD
25.97%
6M
26.39%
1Y
26.50%
3Y*
28.39%
5Y*
19.43%
10Y*
12.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITOT vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF		9.69%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-5.33%21.37%
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF		25.97%5.88%42.17%15.63%17.48%39.97%-24.14%21.60%-18.67%-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ITOT and ENFR is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013

0.51

The correlation between ITOT and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ITOT vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ITOT
ENFR

Technology

33.8%

-

Financial Services

12.1%
0.2%

Communication Services

10.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Industrials

9.5%
3.4%

Healthcare

9.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.7%

-

Energy

3.7%
98.8%

Real Estate

2.4%

-

Utilities

2.3%
1.0%

Basic Materials

2.1%

-

Technology

ITOT
33.8%
ENFR

-

Financial Services

ITOT
12.1%
ENFR
0.2%

Communication Services

ITOT
10.3%
ENFR

-

Consumer Cyclical

ITOT
10.1%
ENFR

-

Industrials

ITOT
9.5%
ENFR
3.4%

Healthcare

ITOT
9.0%
ENFR

-

Consumer Defensive

ITOT
4.7%
ENFR

-

Energy

ITOT
3.7%
ENFR
98.8%

Real Estate

ITOT
2.4%
ENFR

-

Utilities

ITOT
2.3%
ENFR
1.0%

Basic Materials

ITOT
2.1%
ENFR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF

Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF

Often compared with ITOT:
ITOT vs. VTIITOT vs. VOOITOT vs. SCHBITOT vs. SPYITOT vs. FSKAXITOT vs. IVVITOT vs. IXUS
Often compared with ENFR:
ENFR vs. AMLPENFR vs. MLPXENFR vs. TPYPENFR vs. EMLPENFR vs. UMIENFR vs. MPLXENFR vs. ATMP

Return for Risk

ITOT vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
ENFR
ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITOT vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ITOTENFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.96
1.82

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.66
2.52

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.31

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

3.08

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.50

8.18

+4.31

ITOT vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITOT and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITOT vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITOT drawdown since its inception was -55.20%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITOT and ENFR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ITOTENFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.20%

-68.28%

+13.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-8.64%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-15.58%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-20.29%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-62.64%

+27.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.12%

-3.91%

+1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-15.95%

+8.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

3.25%

-1.26%

Volatility

ITOT vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) is 4.57%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that ITOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ITOTENFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

5.63%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

11.48%

-1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.69%

14.66%

-1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.43%

19.30%

-1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.29%

24.67%

-6.38%

ITOT vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITOT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ITOT vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than ENFR's 3.98% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF		3.98%4.77%4.41%5.48%5.23%7.86%7.57%5.81%3.98%2.98%3.31%3.34%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF		0.99%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

ITOT and ENFR have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENFR has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to ITOT (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITOT dropped -55.20% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

On 10-year performance, ITOT leads with 14.99% vs 12.28% for ENFR. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 14.99% return vs 12.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ENFR.

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 0.99% for ITOT.

ITOT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ENFR is Energy Equities. ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for ITOT and 0.35% for ENFR.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITOT and ENFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer