ITGR vs. ACHC
ITGR (Integer Holdings Corporation) and ACHC (Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Healthcare sector — ITGR in Medical Devices, ACHC in Medical Care Facilities. Over the past 10 years, ITGR returned 18.38%/yr vs -5.36%/yr for ACHC. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ITGR vs. ACHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITGR achieves a 54.55% return, which is significantly lower than ACHC's 108.74% return. Over the past 10 years, ITGR has outperformed ACHC with an annualized return of 18.38%, while ACHC has yielded a comparatively lower -5.36% annualized return.
ITGR
- 1D
- 20.18%
- 1M
- 27.40%
- 6M
- 39.55%
- YTD
- 54.55%
- 1Y
- 13.79%
- 3Y*
- 9.38%
- 5Y*
- 4.37%
- 10Y*
- 18.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.61%
ACHC
- 1D
- 5.26%
- 1M
- -7.18%
- 6M
- 120.39%
- YTD
- 108.74%
- 1Y
- 40.45%
- 3Y*
- -27.73%
- 5Y*
- -13.66%
- 10Y*
- -5.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $103.27M | $101.50M | $84.18M | |
| $66.12M | $55.28M | $49.28M |
ITGR vs. ACHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITGR Integer Holdings Corporation | 54.55% | -40.82% | 33.75% | 44.73% | -20.01% | 5.42% | 0.94% | 5.47% | 68.34% | 53.82% |
ACHC Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. | 108.74% | -64.21% | -49.01% | -5.54% | 35.62% | 20.77% | 51.29% | 29.21% | -21.21% | -1.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITGR and ACHC is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2000 | 0.21 |
The correlation between ITGR and ACHC shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.37 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ITGR:
$4.12B
ACHC:
$2.76B
ITGR:
$4.04
ACHC:
-$12.40
ITGR:
2.29
ACHC:
0.80
ITGR:
2.46
ACHC:
1.37
ITGR:
$1.86B
ACHC:
$3.37B
ITGR:
$491.10M
ACHC:
$1.05B
ITGR:
$308.94M
ACHC:
-$750.65M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITGR vs. ACHC — Risk / Return Rank
ITGR
ACHC
ITGR vs. ACHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) and Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITGR | ACHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.16 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 0.63 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.53 | 1.38 | -0.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITGR vs. ACHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITGR drawdown since its inception was -67.97%, smaller than the maximum ACHC drawdown of -98.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITGR and ACHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITGR | ACHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.97% | -98.77% | +30.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.74% | -57.11% | +14.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.14% | -86.63% | +30.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.14% | -86.89% | +30.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.14% | -86.89% | +30.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.04% | -66.74% | +50.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.98% | -56.50% | +27.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.11% | 26.21% | -4.10% |
Volatility
ITGR vs. ACHC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) is 20.12%, while Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC) has a volatility of 22.75%. This indicates that ITGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITGR | ACHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.12% | 22.75% | -2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.57% | 46.44% | -18.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.27% | 68.66% | -21.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.81% | 47.16% | -11.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.55% | 48.87% | -10.32% |
Dividends
ITGR vs. ACHC - Dividend Comparison
Neither ITGR nor ACHC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ITGR vs. ACHC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Integer Holdings Corporation and Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ITGR vs. ACHC - Profitability Comparison
ITGR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Integer Holdings Corporation reported a gross profit of 109.60M and revenue of 439.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.9%.
ACHC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 865.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ITGR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Integer Holdings Corporation reported an operating income of 31.87M and revenue of 439.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.
ACHC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 865.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
ITGR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Integer Holdings Corporation reported a net income of 16.51M and revenue of 439.58M, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.
ACHC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. reported a net income of 10.93M and revenue of 865.84M, resulting in a net margin of 1.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ITGR and ACHC have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACHC has higher volatility (22.75%) compared to ITGR (20.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITGR dropped -67.97% vs ACHC's -98.77%.
ACHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITGR and ACHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer