ACHC vs. DUK
ACHC (Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.) and DUK (Duke Energy Corporation) are both stocks. ACHC operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare), while DUK operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, ACHC returned -5.36%/yr vs 8.22%/yr for DUK. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ACHC vs. DUK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACHC achieves a 108.74% return, which is significantly higher than DUK's 8.86% return. Over the past 10 years, ACHC has underperformed DUK with an annualized return of -5.36%, while DUK has yielded a comparatively higher 8.22% annualized return.
ACHC
- 1D
- 5.26%
- 1M
- -7.18%
- 6M
- 120.39%
- YTD
- 108.74%
- 1Y
- 40.45%
- 3Y*
- -27.73%
- 5Y*
- -13.66%
- 10Y*
- -5.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.68%
DUK
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- 6M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 8.86%
- 1Y
- 5.62%
- 3Y*
- 15.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $103.27M | $101.50M | $84.18M | |
| $477.93M | $469.09M | $452.15M |
ACHC vs. DUK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACHC Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. | 108.74% | -64.21% | -49.01% | -5.54% | 35.62% | 20.77% | 51.29% | 29.21% | -21.21% | -1.42% |
DUK Duke Energy Corporation | 8.86% | 12.72% | 15.56% | -1.63% | 2.03% | 19.11% | 4.77% | 10.29% | 7.41% | 12.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACHC and DUK is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 1994 | 0.04 |
The correlation between ACHC and DUK shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ACHC:
$2.76B
DUK:
$97.78B
ACHC:
-$12.40
DUK:
$6.61
ACHC:
0.80
DUK:
2.93
ACHC:
1.37
DUK:
1.83
ACHC:
$3.37B
DUK:
$33.29B
ACHC:
$1.05B
DUK:
$19.45B
ACHC:
-$750.65M
DUK:
$15.91B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACHC vs. DUK — Risk / Return Rank
ACHC
DUK
ACHC vs. DUK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACHC | DUK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.08 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 0.62 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.38 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACHC vs. DUK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACHC drawdown since its inception was -98.77%, which is greater than DUK's maximum drawdown of -71.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACHC and DUK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACHC | DUK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.77% | -71.92% | -26.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.11% | -10.88% | -46.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.63% | -11.59% | -75.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.89% | -24.16% | -62.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.89% | -37.37% | -49.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.74% | -5.20% | -61.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.50% | -10.83% | -45.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.21% | 4.84% | +21.37% |
Volatility
ACHC vs. DUK - Volatility Comparison
Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC) has a higher volatility of 22.75% compared to Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) at 6.63%. This indicates that ACHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACHC | DUK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.75% | 6.63% | +16.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.44% | 12.49% | +33.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.66% | 15.65% | +53.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.16% | 17.96% | +29.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.87% | 20.46% | +28.41% |
Dividends
ACHC vs. DUK - Dividend Comparison
ACHC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DUK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACHC Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DUK Duke Energy Corporation | 3.40% | 3.60% | 3.84% | 4.18% | 3.86% | 3.72% | 4.17% | 4.11% | 4.21% | 4.15% | 4.33% | 4.54% |
Financials
ACHC vs. DUK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. and Duke Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ACHC vs. DUK - Profitability Comparison
ACHC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 865.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
DUK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.23B and revenue of 9.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.9%.
ACHC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 865.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
DUK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 2.73B and revenue of 9.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.7%.
ACHC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. reported a net income of 10.93M and revenue of 865.84M, resulting in a net margin of 1.3%.
DUK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 9.18B, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACHC and DUK have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACHC has higher volatility (22.75%) compared to DUK (6.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACHC dropped -98.77% vs DUK's -71.92%.
ACHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACHC and DUK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer