ACHC vs. TSLA
ACHC (Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.) and TSLA (Tesla, Inc.) are both stocks. ACHC operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare), while TSLA operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, ACHC returned -8.10%/yr vs 40.05%/yr for TSLA. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ACHC vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACHC achieves a 81.32% return, which is significantly higher than TSLA's -5.79% return. Over the past 10 years, ACHC has underperformed TSLA with an annualized return of -8.10%, while TSLA has yielded a comparatively higher 40.05% annualized return.
ACHC
- 1D
- 5.36%
- 1M
- -7.06%
- YTD
- 81.32%
- 6M
- 75.15%
- 1Y
- 14.66%
- 3Y*
- -28.19%
- 5Y*
- -17.07%
- 10Y*
- -8.10%
TSLA
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 7.95%
- YTD
- -5.79%
- 6M
- -5.16%
- 1Y
- 23.07%
- 3Y*
- 25.57%
- 5Y*
- 16.24%
- 10Y*
- 40.05%
ACHC vs. TSLA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACHC Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. | 81.32% | -64.21% | -49.01% | -5.54% | 35.62% | 20.77% | 51.29% | 29.21% | -21.21% | -1.42% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | -5.79% | 11.36% | 62.52% | 101.72% | -65.03% | 49.76% | 743.44% | 25.70% | 6.89% | 45.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACHC and TSLA is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2010 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
ACHC:
$2.34B
TSLA:
$1.50T
ACHC:
-$12.22
TSLA:
$1.10
ACHC:
0.69
TSLA:
15.28
ACHC:
1.19
TSLA:
17.82
ACHC:
$3.37B
TSLA:
$97.88B
ACHC:
$1.76B
TSLA:
$18.66B
ACHC:
-$726.15M
TSLA:
$10.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACHC vs. TSLA — Risk / Return Rank
ACHC
TSLA
ACHC vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACHC | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.23 | 0.50 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.82 | 0.97 | -0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.12 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 0.77 | -0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.56 | 1.81 | -1.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACHC | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 0.50 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.37 | 0.28 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.17 | 0.68 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.73 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
ACHC vs. TSLA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACHC drawdown since its inception was -98.77%, which is greater than TSLA's maximum drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACHC and TSLA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACHC | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.77% | -73.63% | -25.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.11% | -29.93% | -27.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.63% | -53.77% | -32.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.89% | -73.63% | -13.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.89% | -73.63% | -13.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.11% | -13.51% | -57.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.46% | -22.73% | -33.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.44% | 12.84% | +13.60% |
Volatility
ACHC vs. TSLA - Volatility Comparison
Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC) has a higher volatility of 16.34% compared to Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) at 12.12%. This indicates that ACHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACHC | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.34% | 12.12% | +4.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.97% | 27.28% | +22.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.21% | 46.36% | +18.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.82% | 58.85% | -13.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.63% | 59.11% | -10.48% |
Dividends
ACHC vs. TSLA - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACHC nor TSLA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ACHC vs. TSLA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. and Tesla, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ACHC vs. TSLA - Profitability Comparison
ACHC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 828.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
TSLA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.72B and revenue of 22.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.
ACHC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 828.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
TSLA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported an operating income of 941.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
ACHC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. reported a net income of 4.11M and revenue of 828.80M, resulting in a net margin of 0.5%.
TSLA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a net income of 491.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACHC and TSLA have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACHC has higher volatility (16.34%) compared to TSLA (12.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACHC dropped -98.77% vs TSLA's -73.63%.
TSLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACHC and TSLA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer