PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACHC vs. TSLA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ACHC vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACHC achieves a 115.36% return, which is significantly higher than TSLA's -12.22% return. Over the past 10 years, ACHC has underperformed TSLA with an annualized return of -5.38%, while TSLA has yielded a comparatively higher 38.97% annualized return.


ACHC

1D
-2.30%
1M
24.23%
6M
130.99%
YTD
115.36%
1Y
25.45%
3Y*
-25.96%
5Y*
-12.81%
10Y*
-5.38%

TSLA

1D
-3.19%
1M
-2.87%
6M
-12.07%
YTD
-12.22%
1Y
25.92%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
12.63%
10Y*
38.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACHC vs. TSLA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACHC
Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.
115.36%-64.21%-49.01%-5.54%35.62%20.77%51.29%29.21%-21.21%-1.42%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
-12.22%11.36%62.52%101.72%-65.03%49.76%743.44%25.70%6.89%45.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ACHC and TSLA is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2010

0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACHC:

$2.81B

TSLA:

$1.48T

EPS

ACHC:

-$12.22

TSLA:

$1.10

PS Ratio

ACHC:

0.82

TSLA:

14.25

PB Ratio

ACHC:

1.42

TSLA:

16.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACHC:

$3.37B

TSLA:

$97.88B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACHC:

$1.76B

TSLA:

$18.66B

EBITDA (TTM)

ACHC:

-$726.15M

TSLA:

$10.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACHC vs. TSLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACHC
ACHC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ACHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACHC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ACHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACHC Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLA
TSLA Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
TSLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLA Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLA Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACHC vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACHCTSLADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.13

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

0.87

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.97

1.91

-0.94

ACHC vs. TSLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACHC Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the TSLA Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACHC and TSLA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACHC vs. TSLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACHC drawdown since its inception was -98.77%, which is greater than TSLA's maximum drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACHC and TSLA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACHCTSLADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.77%

-73.63%

-25.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.11%

-29.93%

-27.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.63%

-53.77%

-32.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.89%

-73.63%

-13.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.89%

-73.63%

-13.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.69%

-19.42%

-46.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.49%

-22.70%

-33.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.48%

13.61%

+12.87%

Volatility

ACHC vs. TSLA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC) is 15.68%, while Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) has a volatility of 17.43%. This indicates that ACHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACHCTSLADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.68%

17.43%

-1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.72%

31.20%

+17.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.55%

44.82%

+21.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.40%

59.30%

-12.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.62%

59.26%

-10.64%

Dividends

ACHC vs. TSLA - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACHC nor TSLA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ACHC vs. TSLA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. and Tesla, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
828.80M
22.39B
(ACHC) Total Revenue
(TSLA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ACHC vs. TSLA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. and Tesla, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
21.1%
Portfolio components
ACHC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 828.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TSLA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.72B and revenue of 22.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.

ACHC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 828.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

TSLA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported an operating income of 941.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

ACHC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. reported a net income of 4.11M and revenue of 828.80M, resulting in a net margin of 0.5%.

TSLA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a net income of 491.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ACHC and TSLA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLA has higher volatility (17.43%) compared to ACHC (15.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACHC dropped -98.77% vs TSLA's -73.63%.

TSLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACHC and TSLA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer