PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACHC vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACHC vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACHC achieves a 72.09% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ACHC has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of -8.57%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.


ACHC

1D
4.76%
1M
-12.32%
YTD
72.09%
6M
48.09%
1Y
12.90%
3Y*
-29.43%
5Y*
-17.78%
10Y*
-8.57%

GLD

1D
0.17%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
3.95%
6M
6.38%
1Y
32.18%
3Y*
31.53%
5Y*
18.64%
10Y*
13.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACHC vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACHC
Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.
72.09%-64.21%-49.01%-5.54%35.62%20.77%51.29%29.21%-21.21%-1.42%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
3.95%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ACHC and GLD is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2004

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACHC vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACHC
ACHC Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
ACHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACHC Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ACHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACHC Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACHC vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACHCGLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.20

1.22

-1.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.78

1.61

-0.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.24

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

1.86

-1.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.30

4.66

-4.36

ACHC vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACHC Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACHC and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACHCGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

1.22

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

1.04

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.18

0.83

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.60

-0.60

Drawdowns

ACHC vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACHC drawdown since its inception was -98.77%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACHC and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACHCGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.77%

-45.56%

-53.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.11%

-19.21%

-37.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.63%

-19.21%

-67.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.89%

-21.03%

-65.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.89%

-22.00%

-64.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-72.58%

-16.93%

-55.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.46%

-16.16%

-40.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.44%

7.65%

+18.79%

Volatility

ACHC vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC) has a higher volatility of 15.25% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 5.78%. This indicates that ACHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACHCGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.25%

5.78%

+9.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.78%

23.14%

+26.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.16%

26.71%

+38.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.76%

18.02%

+27.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.61%

15.95%

+32.66%

Dividends

ACHC vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACHC nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ACHC and GLD have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACHC has higher volatility (15.25%) compared to GLD (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACHC dropped -98.77% vs GLD's -45.56%.

GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACHC and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer