ITEQ vs. XLKI

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ITEQ (BlueStar Israel Technology ETF) and XLKI (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. ITEQ is passively managed, while XLKI is actively managed. Over the past year, ITEQ returned 21.03% vs 26.30% for XLKI. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ITEQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLKI.

Performance

ITEQ vs. XLKI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITEQ achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly lower than XLKI's 12.19% return.

ITEQ

• 1D: 2.65%
• 1M: -3.28%
• 6M: 5.33%
• YTD: 10.36%
• 1Y: 21.03%
• 3Y*: 12.50%
• 5Y*: -1.44%
• 10Y*: 9.84%
• ALL TIME*: 9.19%

XLKI

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: 0.31%
• 6M: 9.72%
• YTD: 12.19%
• 1Y: 26.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF	$214.03K	$196.04K	$284.63K
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	$526.89K	$421.64K	$346.32K

ITEQ vs. XLKI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF	10.36%	4.56%
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	12.19%	10.02%

Correlation

The correlation between ITEQ and XLKI is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.69

The correlation between ITEQ and XLKI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

ITEQ vs. XLKI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ITEQ	XLKI
Technology	64.1%	99.2%
Industrials	11.2%	-
Utilities	9.1%	-
Financial Services	5.1%	99.9%
Healthcare	4.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.3%	-
Communication Services	2.9%	0.8%
Energy	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

ITEQ vs. XLKI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ITEQ

ITEQ Risk / Return Rank: 36
ITEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
ITEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
ITEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 31
ITEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
ITEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 38

XLKI

XLKI Risk / Return Rank: 57
XLKI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
XLKI Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
XLKI Omega Ratio Rank: 53
XLKI Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
XLKI Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ITEQ vs. XLKI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ITEQ	XLKI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	1.33	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	1.84	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.25	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	2.36	-0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.96	8.25	-4.29

ITEQ vs. XLKI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITEQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the XLKI Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITEQ and XLKI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ITEQ vs. XLKI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITEQ drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than XLKI's maximum drawdown of -11.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEQ and XLKI.

Drawdown Indicators

	ITEQ	XLKI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.63%	-11.21%	-43.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.29%	-11.21%	-2.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.23%	-5.44%	-12.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.49%	-2.17%	-16.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.32%	3.20%	+2.12%

Volatility

ITEQ vs. XLKI - Volatility Comparison

BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI) have volatilities of 8.08% and 8.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ITEQ	XLKI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.08%	8.46%	-0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.94%	17.52%	+2.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.63%	19.95%	+4.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.36%	19.92%	+5.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.57%	19.92%	+3.65%

ITEQ vs. XLKI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITEQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKI's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ITEQ vs. XLKI - Dividend Comparison

ITEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than XLKI's 19.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF	0.77%	0.85%	0.01%
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	19.68%	8.52%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ITEQ and XLKI in my portfolio?

ITEQ and XLKI have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ITEQ or XLKI?

XLKI has higher volatility (8.46%) compared to ITEQ (8.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITEQ dropped -54.63% vs XLKI's -11.21%.

Which ETF is better, ITEQ or XLKI?

On 1-year performance, XLKI leads with 26.30% vs 21.03% for ITEQ. On fees, XLKI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ITEQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ITEQ or XLKI?

Over the 1-year period, XLKI has performed better with a 26.30% return vs 21.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ITEQ or XLKI?

XLKI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ITEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ITEQ or XLKI?

XLKI has the higher dividend yield at 19.68%, compared with 0.77% for ITEQ.

What is the main difference between ITEQ and XLKI?

They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ITEQ and 0.35% for XLKI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLKI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.