PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITEQ vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITEQ vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITEQ achieves a 17.19% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ITEQ having a 11.00% annualized return and USL not far behind at 10.91%.


ITEQ

1D
-2.89%
1M
7.48%
YTD
17.19%
6M
20.44%
1Y
27.92%
3Y*
14.27%
5Y*
0.67%
10Y*
11.00%

USL

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
63.07%
6M
59.66%
1Y
57.86%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITEQ vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITEQ
BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
17.19%13.71%11.70%4.70%-30.36%-8.04%58.96%37.59%-0.63%26.87%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
63.07%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%27.10%62.48%-25.23%28.01%-14.15%2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between ITEQ and USL is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2015

0.16

The correlation between ITEQ and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ITEQ vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ITEQ
USL

Technology

58.7%

-

Industrials

16.6%

-

Utilities

10.1%

-

Financial Services

5.1%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

3.3%

-

Healthcare

2.3%

-

Energy

2.0%

-

Communication Services

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

ITEQ
58.7%
USL

-

Industrials

ITEQ
16.6%
USL

-

Utilities

ITEQ
10.1%
USL

-

Financial Services

ITEQ
5.1%
USL
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ITEQ
3.3%
USL

-

Healthcare

ITEQ
2.3%
USL

-

Energy

ITEQ
2.0%
USL

-

Communication Services

ITEQ
1.4%
USL

-

Basic Materials

ITEQ

-

USL

-

Consumer Defensive

ITEQ

-

USL

-

Real Estate

ITEQ

-

USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITEQ vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITEQ
ITEQ Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
ITEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ITEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITEQ vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITEQUSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.34

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

3.47

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.76

7.02

-1.26

ITEQ vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the USL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITEQ and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITEQUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

2.04

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.58

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.34

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.01

+0.42

Drawdowns

ITEQ vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITEQ drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEQ and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITEQUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.63%

-89.06%

+34.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-16.76%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.78%

-23.33%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.29%

-33.82%

-16.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.63%

-66.02%

+11.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.17%

-38.16%

+24.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.52%

-61.46%

+42.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.86%

8.27%

-3.41%

Volatility

ITEQ vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) is 7.71%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that ITEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITEQUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.71%

10.53%

-2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.33%

23.33%

-6.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.77%

28.54%

-5.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.96%

30.08%

-5.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.40%

32.35%

-8.95%

ITEQ vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITEQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

ITEQ vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

ITEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
ITEQ
BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
0.72%0.85%0.01%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITEQ and USL have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to ITEQ (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITEQ dropped -54.63% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 10-year performance, ITEQ leads with 11.00% vs 10.91% for USL. On fees, ITEQ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, ITEQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ITEQ has performed better with a 11.00% return vs 10.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITEQ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

ITEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

ITEQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. ITEQ tracks BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ITEQ and 0.88% for USL.

USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITEQ and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer