ITEQ vs. DFNV
ITEQ (BlueStar Israel Technology ETF) and DFNV (TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - ITEQ tracks the BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index while DFNV tracks the TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Free Cash Flow Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ITEQ returned 0.67%/yr vs 9.69%/yr for DFNV. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ITEQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for DFNV.
Performance
ITEQ vs. DFNV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITEQ achieves a 17.19% return, which is significantly higher than DFNV's 2.99% return.
ITEQ
- 1D
- -2.89%
- 1M
- 7.48%
- YTD
- 17.19%
- 6M
- 20.44%
- 1Y
- 27.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
DFNV
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 11.80%
- YTD
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 1.14%
- 1Y
- 7.73%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- —
ITEQ vs. DFNV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 17.19% | 13.71% | 11.70% | 4.70% | -30.36% | -8.04% | 8.08% |
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF | 2.99% | 8.42% | 31.93% | 26.92% | -24.05% | 18.51% | 2.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITEQ and DFNV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020 | 0.83 |
The correlation between ITEQ and DFNV shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ITEQ vs. DFNV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITEQ
DFNV
Technology
Industrials
Utilities
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
ITEQ
DFNV
Industrials
ITEQ
DFNV
Utilities
ITEQ
DFNV
-
Financial Services
ITEQ
DFNV
-
Consumer Cyclical
ITEQ
DFNV
Healthcare
ITEQ
DFNV
Energy
ITEQ
DFNV
-
Communication Services
ITEQ
DFNV
Basic Materials
ITEQ
-
DFNV
-
Consumer Defensive
ITEQ
-
DFNV
-
Real Estate
ITEQ
-
DFNV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITEQ vs. DFNV — Risk / Return Rank
ITEQ
DFNV
ITEQ vs. DFNV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITEQ | DFNV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.09 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 0.36 | +1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.76 | 0.87 | +4.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITEQ | DFNV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 0.44 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.50 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.54 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
ITEQ vs. DFNV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITEQ drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than DFNV's maximum drawdown of -29.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEQ and DFNV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITEQ | DFNV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -29.71% | -24.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -21.54% | +8.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.78% | -22.72% | -4.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.29% | -29.71% | -20.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.17% | -3.91% | -9.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.52% | -9.47% | -9.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.86% | 8.90% | -4.04% |
Volatility
ITEQ vs. DFNV - Volatility Comparison
BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) has a higher volatility of 7.71% compared to TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) at 6.59%. This indicates that ITEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFNV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITEQ | DFNV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.71% | 6.59% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.33% | 14.86% | +2.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.77% | 17.69% | +5.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.96% | 19.66% | +5.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.40% | 19.73% | +3.67% |
ITEQ vs. DFNV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITEQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DFNV's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITEQ vs. DFNV - Dividend Comparison
ITEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than DFNV's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF | 0.37% | 0.38% | 1.28% | 0.77% | 1.20% | 4.77% | 0.02% |
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 0.72% | 0.85% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITEQ and DFNV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITEQ has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to DFNV (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITEQ dropped -54.63% vs DFNV's -29.71%.
On 5-year performance, DFNV leads with 9.69% vs 0.67% for ITEQ. On fees, DFNV is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, DFNV has been the lower-risk option at 6.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DFNV has performed better with a 9.69% return vs 0.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFNV is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ITEQ.
ITEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.37% for DFNV.
ITEQ tracks BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index, while DFNV tracks TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Free Cash Flow Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and TrimTabs. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ITEQ and 0.69% for DFNV.
ITEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITEQ and DFNV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer