PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITDH vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITDH vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITDH achieves a 12.29% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.


ITDH

1D
-0.82%
1M
4.82%
YTD
12.29%
6M
13.08%
1Y
29.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIT

1D
-2.76%
1M
-18.50%
YTD
-25.48%
6M
-29.84%
1Y
-38.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITDH vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ITDH
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF
12.29%21.75%17.41%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-25.48%-6.41%99.21%

Correlation

The correlation between ITDH and IBIT is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITDH vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITDH
ITDH Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITDH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITDH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITDH Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ITDH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITDH Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITDH vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITDHIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.86

+0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

-0.79

+3.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.37

-1.36

+14.73

ITDH vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITDH Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITDH and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITDHIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

-0.89

+3.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.75

0.30

+1.45

Drawdowns

ITDH vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITDH drawdown since its inception was -16.25%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDH and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITDHIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.25%

-49.36%

+33.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.64%

-49.36%

+39.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-48.10%

+47.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.58%

-16.02%

+14.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

28.44%

-26.26%

Volatility

ITDH vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH) is 3.85%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that ITDH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITDHIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

9.50%

-5.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

34.44%

-24.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

43.73%

-30.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.52%

50.19%

-35.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.52%

50.19%

-35.67%

ITDH vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITDH has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ITDH vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

ITDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ITDH
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF
1.43%1.60%1.66%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITDH and IBIT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to ITDH (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDH dropped -16.25% vs IBIT's -49.36%.

On 1-year performance, ITDH leads with 29.02% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, ITDH is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, ITDH has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ITDH has performed better with a 29.02% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITDH is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

ITDH has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

ITDH is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for ITDH and 0.25% for IBIT.

ITDH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITDH and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer