ITDH vs. CGDV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ITDH (Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF) and CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITDH is a Target Retirement Date fund actively managed by iShares, while CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ITDH returned 29.02% vs 30.91% for CGDV. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ITDH charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGDV.

Performance

ITDH vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ITDH having a 12.29% return and CGDV slightly lower at 11.89%.

ITDH

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 4.82%
• YTD: 12.29%
• 6M: 13.08%
• 1Y: 29.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGDV

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 5.09%
• YTD: 11.89%
• 6M: 12.43%
• 1Y: 30.91%
• 3Y*: 25.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITDH vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ITDH Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF	12.29%	21.75%	16.71%	12.83%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	11.89%	25.50%	20.10%	13.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ITDH and CGDV is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023	0.90

The correlation between ITDH and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

ITDH vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ITDH	CGDV
Technology	26.8%	34.1%
Financial Services	16.1%	6.8%
Industrials	11.9%	13.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	10.6%
Healthcare	8.3%	11.5%
Communication Services	8.1%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	5.5%
Basic Materials	4.3%	2.9%
Energy	4.3%	3.8%
Real Estate	3.5%	1.1%
Utilities	2.6%	2.1%

Return for Risk

ITDH vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITDH

ITDH Risk / Return Rank: 68
ITDH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
ITDH Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ITDH Omega Ratio Rank: 68
ITDH Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
ITDH Martin Ratio Rank: 72

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 76
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 82
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITDH vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ITDH	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	2.68	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	3.69	-0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.50	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	3.18	-0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.37	15.06	-1.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ITDH vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITDH Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITDH and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ITDH	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29	2.68	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.75	1.24	+0.51

Drawdowns

ITDH vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITDH drawdown since its inception was -16.25%, smaller than the maximum CGDV drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDH and CGDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ITDH	CGDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.25%	-21.82%	+5.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.64%	-9.75%	+0.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.82%	-0.55%	-0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.58%	-3.62%	+2.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	2.06%	+0.12%

Volatility

ITDH vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) at 3.09%. This indicates that ITDH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ITDH	CGDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.85%	3.09%	+0.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.27%	9.13%	+1.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.75%	11.59%	+1.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.52%	15.48%	-0.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.52%	15.48%	-0.96%

ITDH vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITDH has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

ITDH vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

ITDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than CGDV's 1.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.17%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%
ITDH Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF	1.43%	1.60%	1.66%	0.84%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ITDH and CGDV in my portfolio?

ITDH and CGDV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ITDH or CGDV?

ITDH has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to CGDV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDH dropped -16.25% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

Which ETF is better, ITDH or CGDV?

On 1-year performance, CGDV leads with 30.91% vs 29.02% for ITDH. On fees, ITDH is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, CGDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ITDH or CGDV?

Over the 1-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 30.91% return vs 29.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ITDH or CGDV?

ITDH is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ITDH or CGDV?

ITDH has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 1.17% for CGDV.

What is the main difference between ITDH and CGDV?

ITDH is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while CGDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for ITDH and 0.33% for CGDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.