ITB vs. THNQ

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) and THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while THNQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ITB returned 8.18%/yr vs 15.90%/yr for THNQ. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ITB charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for THNQ.

Performance

ITB vs. THNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than THNQ's 35.69% return.

ITB

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: 8.40%
• YTD: 0.87%
• 6M: -5.10%
• 1Y: 8.65%
• 3Y*: 7.35%
• 5Y*: 8.18%
• 10Y*: 14.45%

THNQ

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 7.14%
• YTD: 35.69%
• 6M: 34.00%
• 1Y: 67.55%
• 3Y*: 33.39%
• 5Y*: 15.90%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITB vs. THNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF	0.87%	-5.26%	2.06%	68.91%	-26.26%	49.25%	44.97%
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	35.69%	29.83%	18.82%	56.81%	-39.84%	9.10%	60.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ITB and THNQ is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020	0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between ITB and THNQ has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ITB vs. THNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ITB	THNQ
Consumer Cyclical	71.3%	7.3%
Industrials	19.5%	0.8%
Basic Materials	8.7%	-
Real Estate	0.5%	0.7%
Communication Services	-	10.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	1.4%
Healthcare	-	5.2%
Technology	-	74.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ITB vs. THNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITB

ITB Risk / Return Rank: 12
ITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
ITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
ITB Omega Ratio Rank: 13
ITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
ITB Martin Ratio Rank: 11

THNQ

THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 75
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 72
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITB vs. THNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ITB	THNQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.18	2.32	-2.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.53	2.84	-2.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.37	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.21	3.51	-3.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.41	11.22	-10.82

ITB vs. THNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITB Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the THNQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITB and THNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ITB vs. THNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than THNQ's maximum drawdown of -50.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and THNQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ITB	THNQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.53%	-50.56%	-35.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.04%	-18.39%	-7.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.35%	-29.88%	-3.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.55%	-50.56%	+10.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.53%	-7.88%	-15.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.08%	-15.03%	-22.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.45%	5.74%	+7.71%

Volatility

ITB vs. THNQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) is 9.26%, while ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) has a volatility of 12.29%. This indicates that ITB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ITB	THNQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.26%	12.29%	-3.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.89%	22.64%	-1.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.90%	27.89%	+2.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.29%	29.33%	-0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.05%	28.82%	+1.23%

ITB vs. THNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than THNQ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

ITB vs. THNQ - Dividend Comparison

ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than THNQ's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF	1.17%	1.67%	0.46%	0.48%	0.86%	0.37%	0.46%	0.50%	0.63%	0.28%	0.43%	0.34%
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.15%	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ITB and THNQ in my portfolio?

ITB and THNQ have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ITB or THNQ?

THNQ has higher volatility (12.29%) compared to ITB (9.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITB dropped -86.53% vs THNQ's -50.56%.

Which ETF is better, ITB or THNQ?

On 5-year performance, THNQ leads with 15.90% vs 8.18% for ITB. On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, ITB has been the lower-risk option at 9.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ITB or THNQ?

Over the 5-year period, THNQ has performed better with a 15.90% return vs 8.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ITB or THNQ?

ITB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for THNQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ITB or THNQ?

ITB has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.15% for THNQ.

What is the main difference between ITB and THNQ?

ITB is categorized as Building & Construction, while THNQ is Technology Equities. ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while THNQ tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ITB and 0.68% for THNQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

THNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.