PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ITB vs. PKB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ITB vs. PKB

Last updated Jul 14, 2026
Documentation

ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) and PKB (Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF) are both Building & Construction funds - ITB tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index while PKB tracks the Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ITB returned 13.44%/yr vs 14.51%/yr for PKB. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ITB charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PKB.

Performance

ITB vs. PKB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than PKB's 10.49% return. Over the past 10 years, ITB has underperformed PKB with an annualized return of 13.44%, while PKB has yielded a comparatively higher 14.51% annualized return.

ITB

1D
-1.49%
1M
-0.51%
6M
-10.42%
YTD
0.36%
1Y
-1.85%
3Y*
3.64%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
13.44%

PKB

1D
-1.73%
1M
-3.36%
6M
2.41%
YTD
10.49%
1Y
23.35%
3Y*
22.45%
5Y*
16.40%
10Y*
14.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITB vs. PKB - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITB
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF		0.36%-5.26%2.06%68.91%-26.26%49.25%26.42%48.70%-30.92%59.65%
PKB
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF		10.49%22.47%20.24%55.29%-24.88%32.96%24.49%40.15%-31.11%24.67%

Correlation

The correlation between ITB and PKB is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006

0.82

The correlation between ITB and PKB shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.86 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ITB vs. PKB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ITB
PKB

Consumer Cyclical

74.4%
20.2%

Industrials

16.0%
48.0%

Basic Materials

8.9%
29.0%

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

2.5%

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ITB
74.4%
PKB
20.2%

Industrials

ITB
16.0%
PKB
48.0%

Basic Materials

ITB
8.9%
PKB
29.0%

Real Estate

ITB
0.7%
PKB

-

Communication Services

ITB

-

PKB

-

Consumer Defensive

ITB

-

PKB

-

Energy

ITB

-

PKB
2.5%

Financial Services

ITB

-

PKB
0.1%

Healthcare

ITB

-

PKB

-

Technology

ITB

-

PKB

-

Utilities

ITB

-

PKB
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF

Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF

Often compared with ITB:
ITB vs. XHBITB vs. NAILITB vs. SPYITB vs. XLREITB vs. FSHOXITB vs. VGTITB vs. DRN
Often compared with PKB:
PKB vs. XHBPKB vs. RSPNPKB vs. SDCIPKB vs. QQQPKB vs. VOOPKB vs. VNQPKB vs. AIQ

Return for Risk

ITB vs. PKB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ITB
ITB Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
ITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITB Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
ITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITB Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
PKB
PKB Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PKB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKB Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
PKB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKB Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITB vs. PKB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ITBPKBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.06
0.96

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.14
1.50

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.17

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

1.52

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.13

4.62

-4.75

ITB vs. PKB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITB Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the PKB Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITB and PKB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITB vs. PKB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than PKB's maximum drawdown of -65.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and PKB.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ITBPKBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.53%

-65.21%

-21.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.04%

-15.41%

-10.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.35%

-29.75%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.55%

-34.85%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.10%

-52.29%

+0.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.92%

-10.35%

-13.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.02%

-15.71%

-21.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.00%

5.06%

+8.94%

Volatility

ITB vs. PKB - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a higher volatility of 10.84% compared to Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) at 8.86%. This indicates that ITB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PKB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ITBPKBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.84%

8.86%

+1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.25%

19.37%

+2.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.26%

24.57%

+5.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.51%

25.90%

+3.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.14%

27.33%

+2.81%

ITB vs. PKB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than PKB's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ITB vs. PKB - Dividend Comparison

ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than PKB's 0.19% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITB
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF		0.67%1.67%0.46%0.48%0.86%0.37%0.46%0.50%0.63%0.28%0.43%0.34%
PKB
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF		0.19%0.14%0.23%0.33%0.43%0.25%0.30%0.37%0.54%0.17%0.31%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

ITB and PKB have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITB has higher volatility (10.84%) compared to PKB (8.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITB dropped -86.53% vs PKB's -65.21%.

On 10-year performance, PKB leads with 14.51% vs 13.44% for ITB. On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, PKB has been the lower-risk option at 8.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PKB has performed better with a 14.51% return vs 13.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PKB.

ITB has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.19% for PKB.

ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ITB and 0.60% for PKB.

PKB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITB and PKB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer