PortfoliosLab logo
ITB vs. PKB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ITB and PKB is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ITB vs. PKB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ITB:

-0.48

PKB:

0.31

Sortino Ratio

ITB:

-0.51

PKB:

0.77

Omega Ratio

ITB:

0.94

PKB:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

ITB:

-0.40

PKB:

0.38

Martin Ratio

ITB:

-0.78

PKB:

0.92

Ulcer Index

ITB:

16.93%

PKB:

12.38%

Daily Std Dev

ITB:

28.47%

PKB:

28.41%

Max Drawdown

ITB:

-86.53%

PKB:

-65.21%

Current Drawdown

ITB:

-29.91%

PKB:

-13.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a -12.41% return, which is significantly lower than PKB's 1.32% return. Over the past 10 years, ITB has outperformed PKB with an annualized return of 13.59%, while PKB has yielded a comparatively lower 12.67% annualized return.


ITB

YTD

-12.41%

1M

-3.97%

6M

-26.37%

1Y

-13.71%

3Y*

15.03%

5Y*

16.01%

10Y*

13.59%

PKB

YTD

1.32%

1M

4.51%

6M

-11.75%

1Y

8.61%

3Y*

22.14%

5Y*

20.36%

10Y*

12.67%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ITB vs. PKB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITB has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than PKB's 0.60% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ITB vs. PKB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ITB is 55
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ITB is 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ITB is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ITB is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ITB is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ITB is 66
Martin Ratio Rank

PKB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PKB is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PKB is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PKB is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PKB is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PKB is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PKB is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ITB vs. PKB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ITB Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the PKB Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITB and PKB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ITB vs. PKB - Dividend Comparison

ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than PKB's 0.20% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ITB
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
1.10%0.46%0.48%0.86%0.37%0.46%0.50%0.63%0.28%0.43%0.34%0.34%
PKB
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF
0.20%0.23%0.33%0.43%0.25%0.30%0.37%0.54%0.17%0.31%0.11%0.10%

Drawdowns

ITB vs. PKB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than PKB's maximum drawdown of -65.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and PKB.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ITB vs. PKB - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a higher volatility of 8.28% compared to Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) at 6.22%. This indicates that ITB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PKB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...