ITB vs. XHB
ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) and XHB (SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF) are both Building & Construction funds - ITB tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index while XHB tracks the S&P Homebuilders Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ITB returned 14.54%/yr vs 13.79%/yr for XHB. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ITB charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XHB.
Performance
ITB vs. XHB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than XHB's 6.31% return. Over the past 10 years, ITB has outperformed XHB with an annualized return of 14.54%, while XHB has yielded a comparatively lower 13.79% annualized return.
ITB
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- 7.18%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 9.29%
- 3Y*
- 6.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.38%
- 10Y*
- 14.54%
XHB
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 6.31%
- 6M
- 4.68%
- 1Y
- 15.99%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.79%
ITB vs. XHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 1.44% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 26.42% | 48.70% | -30.92% | 59.65% |
XHB SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF | 6.31% | -0.69% | 9.87% | 60.10% | -28.93% | 49.70% | 27.97% | 41.30% | -25.73% | 31.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITB and XHB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.95 |
The correlation between ITB and XHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
ITB vs. XHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITB
XHB
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ITB
XHB
Industrials
ITB
XHB
Basic Materials
ITB
XHB
-
Real Estate
ITB
XHB
Communication Services
ITB
-
XHB
-
Consumer Defensive
ITB
-
XHB
-
Energy
ITB
-
XHB
-
Financial Services
ITB
-
XHB
-
Healthcare
ITB
-
XHB
-
Technology
ITB
-
XHB
-
Utilities
ITB
-
XHB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITB vs. XHB — Risk / Return Rank
ITB
XHB
ITB vs. XHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITB | XHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.12 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 0.74 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.68 | 1.51 | -0.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITB vs. XHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than XHB's maximum drawdown of -81.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and XHB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITB | XHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -81.61% | -4.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | -21.71% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.35% | -30.53% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.55% | -39.46% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.10% | -49.57% | -2.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.10% | -11.97% | -11.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.06% | -27.57% | -9.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.64% | 10.60% | +3.04% |
Volatility
ITB vs. XHB - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB) have volatilities of 8.66% and 8.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITB | XHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.66% | 8.50% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.41% | 21.06% | +0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.00% | 28.44% | +1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.37% | 27.84% | +1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.10% | 27.52% | +2.58% |
ITB vs. XHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than XHB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITB vs. XHB - Dividend Comparison
ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than XHB's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.66% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
XHB SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF | 0.73% | 0.78% | 0.59% | 0.77% | 1.06% | 0.51% | 0.73% | 0.89% | 1.25% | 0.72% | 0.67% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, ITB and XHB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ITB has higher volatility (8.66%) compared to XHB (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITB dropped -86.53% vs XHB's -81.61%.
On 10-year performance, ITB leads with 14.54% vs 13.79% for XHB. On fees, XHB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XHB has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITB has performed better with a 14.54% return vs 13.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XHB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for ITB.
XHB has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.66% for ITB.
ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while XHB tracks S&P Homebuilders Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ITB and 0.35% for XHB.
XHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITB and XHB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer