ITB vs. XHB
ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) and XHB (SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF) are both Building & Construction funds - ITB tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index while XHB tracks the S&P Homebuilders Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ITB returned 13.44%/yr vs 12.73%/yr for XHB. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ITB charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XHB.
Performance
ITB vs. XHB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than XHB's 4.30% return. Over the past 10 years, ITB has outperformed XHB with an annualized return of 13.44%, while XHB has yielded a comparatively lower 12.73% annualized return.
ITB
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- 6M
- -10.42%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- -1.85%
- 3Y*
- 3.64%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
XHB
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- 6M
- -5.49%
- YTD
- 4.30%
- 1Y
- 2.84%
- 3Y*
- 9.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.25%
- 10Y*
- 12.73%
ITB vs. XHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.36% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 26.42% | 48.70% | -30.92% | 59.65% |
XHB SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF | 4.30% | -0.69% | 9.87% | 60.10% | -28.93% | 49.70% | 27.97% | 41.30% | -25.73% | 31.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITB and XHB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.95 |
The correlation between ITB and XHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
ITB vs. XHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITB
XHB
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ITB
XHB
Industrials
ITB
XHB
Basic Materials
ITB
XHB
Real Estate
ITB
XHB
Communication Services
ITB
-
XHB
-
Consumer Defensive
ITB
-
XHB
Energy
ITB
-
XHB
-
Financial Services
ITB
-
XHB
-
Healthcare
ITB
-
XHB
-
Technology
ITB
-
XHB
-
Utilities
ITB
-
XHB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITB vs. XHB — Risk / Return Rank
ITB
XHB
ITB vs. XHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITB | XHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.04 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 0.13 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | 0.26 | -0.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITB vs. XHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than XHB's maximum drawdown of -81.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and XHB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITB | XHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -81.61% | -4.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | -21.71% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.35% | -30.53% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.55% | -39.46% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.10% | -49.57% | -2.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.92% | -13.63% | -10.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.02% | -27.52% | -9.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.00% | 10.77% | +3.23% |
Volatility
ITB vs. XHB - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a higher volatility of 10.84% compared to SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB) at 10.07%. This indicates that ITB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITB | XHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.84% | 10.07% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.25% | 21.85% | +0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.26% | 28.68% | +1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.51% | 27.97% | +1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.14% | 27.54% | +2.60% |
ITB vs. XHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than XHB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITB vs. XHB - Dividend Comparison
ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than XHB's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.67% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
XHB SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF | 0.61% | 0.78% | 0.59% | 0.77% | 1.06% | 0.51% | 0.73% | 0.89% | 1.25% | 0.72% | 0.67% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, ITB and XHB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ITB has higher volatility (10.84%) compared to XHB (10.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITB dropped -86.53% vs XHB's -81.61%.
On 10-year performance, ITB leads with 13.44% vs 12.73% for XHB. On fees, XHB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XHB has been the lower-risk option at 10.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITB has performed better with a 13.44% return vs 12.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XHB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for ITB.
ITB has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.61% for XHB.
ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while XHB tracks S&P Homebuilders Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ITB and 0.35% for XHB.
XHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITB and XHB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer