ITB vs. SDCI
ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) and SDCI (USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ITB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while SDCI is a Commodities fund tracking the SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ITB returned 8.26%/yr vs 20.07%/yr for SDCI. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ITB charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SDCI.
Performance
ITB vs. SDCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a 1.88% return, which is significantly lower than SDCI's 24.19% return.
ITB
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- 6M
- -8.30%
- YTD
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- -0.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.78%
- 5Y*
- 8.26%
- 10Y*
- 13.57%
SDCI
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 22.42%
- YTD
- 24.19%
- 1Y
- 28.33%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 20.07%
- 10Y*
- —
ITB vs. SDCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 1.88% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 26.42% | 48.70% | -21.48% |
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund | 24.19% | 17.60% | 17.91% | -0.88% | 33.23% | 36.52% | -10.61% | -2.36% | -13.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITB and SDCI is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2018 | 0.08 |
The correlation between ITB and SDCI shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITB vs. SDCI — Risk / Return Rank
ITB
SDCI
ITB vs. SDCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITB | SDCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.30 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 2.74 | -2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | 8.61 | -8.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITB vs. SDCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than SDCI's maximum drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and SDCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITB | SDCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -45.79% | -40.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | -11.03% | -15.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.35% | -11.96% | -21.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.55% | -18.55% | -22.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.77% | -6.59% | -16.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.02% | -11.53% | -25.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.97% | 3.50% | +10.47% |
Volatility
ITB vs. SDCI - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a higher volatility of 11.13% compared to USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) at 4.84%. This indicates that ITB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITB | SDCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.13% | 4.84% | +6.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.59% | 14.60% | +7.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.21% | 17.04% | +13.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.51% | 18.39% | +11.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.13% | 17.07% | +13.06% |
ITB vs. SDCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than SDCI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITB vs. SDCI - Dividend Comparison
ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than SDCI's 2.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.66% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund | 2.96% | 3.68% | 5.92% | 3.46% | 33.49% | 19.26% | 0.20% | 0.93% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITB and SDCI have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITB has higher volatility (11.13%) compared to SDCI (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITB dropped -86.53% vs SDCI's -45.79%.
On 5-year performance, SDCI leads with 20.07% vs 8.26% for ITB. On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, SDCI has been the lower-risk option at 4.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SDCI has performed better with a 20.07% return vs 8.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SDCI.
SDCI has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 0.66% for ITB.
ITB is categorized as Building & Construction, while SDCI is Commodities. ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while SDCI tracks SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ITB and 0.60% for SDCI.
SDCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITB and SDCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer