ITB vs. PIT
ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. ITB is passively managed, while PIT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ITB returned 7.27%/yr vs 24.30%/yr for PIT. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. ITB charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.
Performance
ITB vs. PIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a -3.80% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 41.36% return.
ITB
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- -3.80%
- 6M
- -12.12%
- 1Y
- 4.04%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
PIT
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- 41.36%
- 6M
- 42.58%
- 1Y
- 62.93%
- 3Y*
- 24.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITB vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | -3.80% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -0.84% |
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 41.36% | 21.63% | 6.77% | -4.54% | 2.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITB and PIT is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2022 | -0.04 |
The correlation between ITB and PIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITB vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank
ITB
PIT
ITB vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITB | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.52 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 6.83 | -6.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.31 | 23.27 | -22.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITB | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | 2.97 | -2.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 1.07 | -0.96 |
Drawdowns
ITB vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than PIT's maximum drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and PIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITB | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -12.27% | -74.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | -9.27% | -16.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.35% | -12.27% | -21.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.07% | -4.56% | -22.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.10% | -3.99% | -33.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.09% | 2.71% | +10.38% |
Volatility
ITB vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a higher volatility of 8.17% compared to VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) at 6.08%. This indicates that ITB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITB | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.17% | 6.08% | +2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.42% | 19.02% | +1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.47% | 21.30% | +8.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.19% | 17.47% | +11.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.00% | 17.47% | +12.53% |
ITB vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITB has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITB vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison
ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than PIT's 6.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 1.23% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 6.31% | 8.92% | 3.59% | 6.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITB and PIT have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITB has higher volatility (8.17%) compared to PIT (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITB dropped -86.53% vs PIT's -12.27%.
On 3-year performance, PIT leads with 24.30% vs 7.27% for ITB. On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, PIT has been the lower-risk option at 6.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PIT has performed better with a 24.30% return vs 7.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITB is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.
PIT has the higher dividend yield at 6.31%, compared with 1.23% for ITB.
ITB is categorized as Building & Construction, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ITB and 0.55% for PIT.
PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITB and PIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer