PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIT vs. VYMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIT vs. VYMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIT achieves a 41.36% return, which is significantly higher than VYMI's 11.31% return.


PIT

1D
0.58%
1M
-2.84%
YTD
41.36%
6M
42.58%
1Y
62.93%
3Y*
24.30%
5Y*
10Y*

VYMI

1D
-1.01%
1M
2.05%
YTD
11.31%
6M
14.77%
1Y
30.23%
3Y*
21.88%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
10.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIT vs. VYMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
41.36%21.63%6.77%-4.54%2.74%
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
11.31%38.05%7.06%17.07%0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PIT and VYMI is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2022

0.24

The correlation between PIT and VYMI shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIT vs. VYMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIT
PIT Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

VYMI
VYMI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VYMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYMI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VYMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYMI Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIT vs. VYMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PITVYMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.43

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.83

2.99

+3.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.27

11.80

+11.47

PIT vs. VYMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIT Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is comparable to the VYMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIT and VYMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PITVYMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97

2.35

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

0.65

+0.42

Drawdowns

PIT vs. VYMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIT drawdown since its inception was -12.27%, smaller than the maximum VYMI drawdown of -40.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIT and VYMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PITVYMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.27%

-40.00%

+27.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.27%

-10.14%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.27%

-12.84%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.56%

-1.40%

-3.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-6.31%

+2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

2.57%

+0.14%

Volatility

PIT vs. VYMI - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) at 4.04%. This indicates that PIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PITVYMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.08%

4.04%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.02%

10.73%

+8.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.30%

12.94%

+8.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

14.84%

+2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.47%

16.87%

+0.60%

PIT vs. VYMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIT has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VYMI's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIT vs. VYMI - Dividend Comparison

PIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, more than VYMI's 3.44% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
6.31%8.92%3.59%6.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
3.44%3.68%4.84%4.58%4.70%4.30%3.22%4.20%4.29%3.21%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIT and VYMI have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIT has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to VYMI (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIT dropped -12.27% vs VYMI's -40.00%.

On 3-year performance, PIT leads with 24.30% vs 21.88% for VYMI. On fees, VYMI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VYMI has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PIT has performed better with a 24.30% return vs 21.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYMI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 6.31%, compared with 3.44% for VYMI.

PIT is categorized as Commodities, while VYMI is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PIT and 0.07% for VYMI.

PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIT and VYMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer