PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITB vs. IYW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITB vs. IYW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly lower than IYW's 27.07% return. Over the past 10 years, ITB has underperformed IYW with an annualized return of 14.46%, while IYW has yielded a comparatively higher 26.12% annualized return.


ITB

1D
3.61%
1M
9.46%
YTD
3.43%
6M
1.45%
1Y
11.44%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
8.98%
10Y*
14.46%

IYW

1D
2.91%
1M
5.65%
YTD
27.07%
6M
27.03%
1Y
54.71%
3Y*
33.01%
5Y*
21.94%
10Y*
26.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITB vs. IYW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITB
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
3.43%-5.26%2.06%68.91%-26.26%49.25%26.42%48.70%-30.92%59.65%
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
27.07%25.38%30.25%65.44%-34.83%35.44%47.45%46.64%-0.93%36.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ITB and IYW is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between ITB and IYW has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITB vs. IYW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITB
ITB Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITB Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
ITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITB Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

IYW
IYW Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYW Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYW Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITB vs. IYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ITBIYWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.41

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.53

3.03

-2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.02

9.70

-8.68

ITB vs. IYW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITB Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the IYW Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITB and IYW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITB vs. IYW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than IYW's maximum drawdown of -81.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and IYW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITBIYWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.53%

-81.90%

-4.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.04%

-17.81%

-8.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.35%

-26.47%

-6.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.55%

-39.44%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.10%

-39.44%

-12.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.59%

-2.42%

-19.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.07%

-34.60%

-2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.60%

5.56%

+8.04%

Volatility

ITB vs. IYW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) is 9.20%, while iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that ITB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IYW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITBIYWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.20%

10.44%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.35%

18.17%

+3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.94%

21.97%

+7.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.35%

26.17%

+3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.08%

25.25%

+4.83%

ITB vs. IYW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ITB and IYW have an expense ratio of 0.38%.


Dividends

ITB vs. IYW - Dividend Comparison

ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than IYW's 0.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITB
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
0.65%1.67%0.46%0.48%0.86%0.37%0.46%0.50%0.63%0.28%0.43%0.34%
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
0.10%0.14%0.21%0.34%0.50%0.31%0.56%0.72%0.92%0.82%1.14%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITB and IYW have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYW has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to ITB (9.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITB dropped -86.53% vs IYW's -81.90%.

On 10-year performance, IYW leads with 26.12% vs 14.46% for ITB. Both ETFs have the same 0.38% expense ratio. On volatility, ITB has been the lower-risk option at 9.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYW has performed better with a 26.12% return vs 14.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITB and IYW have the same expense ratio: 0.38% per year.

ITB has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.10% for IYW.

ITB is categorized as Building & Construction, while IYW is Technology Equities. ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while IYW tracks Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index.

IYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITB and IYW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer