ITB vs. FTXR
ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) and FTXR (First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while FTXR is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Transportation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ITB returned 6.57%/yr vs 8.30%/yr for FTXR. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ITB charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXR.
Performance
ITB vs. FTXR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a -1.69% return, which is significantly lower than FTXR's 14.58% return.
ITB
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- 6M
- -7.21%
- YTD
- -1.69%
- 1Y
- -5.06%
- 3Y*
- 2.79%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- 13.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.08%
FTXR
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- 6M
- 11.22%
- YTD
- 14.58%
- 1Y
- 41.32%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $21.02M | $11.11M | $8.84M | |
| $179.18M | $195.32M | $218.82M |
ITB vs. FTXR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | -1.69% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 26.42% | 48.70% | -30.92% | 59.65% |
FTXR First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF | 14.58% | 14.70% | 17.09% | 20.93% | -25.38% | 24.02% | 15.03% | 14.82% | -15.27% | 15.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITB and FTXR is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.58 |
The correlation between ITB and FTXR shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ITB vs. FTXR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITB
FTXR
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ITB
FTXR
Industrials
ITB
FTXR
Basic Materials
ITB
FTXR
-
Real Estate
ITB
FTXR
-
Communication Services
ITB
-
FTXR
-
Consumer Defensive
ITB
-
FTXR
-
Energy
ITB
-
FTXR
Financial Services
ITB
-
FTXR
-
Healthcare
ITB
-
FTXR
-
Technology
ITB
-
FTXR
-
Utilities
ITB
-
FTXR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITB vs. FTXR — Risk / Return Rank
ITB
FTXR
ITB vs. FTXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITB | FTXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.30 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 2.66 | -2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.17 | 9.11 | -9.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITB vs. FTXR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than FTXR's maximum drawdown of -52.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and FTXR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITB | FTXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -52.06% | -34.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | -14.49% | -11.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.35% | -29.71% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.55% | -33.96% | -6.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.47% | -3.12% | -22.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.98% | -10.90% | -26.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.54% | 4.22% | +10.32% |
Volatility
ITB vs. FTXR - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a higher volatility of 8.79% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR) at 4.77%. This indicates that ITB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTXR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITB | FTXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.79% | 4.77% | +4.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.03% | 16.91% | +5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.51% | 21.51% | +8.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.57% | 23.93% | +5.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.20% | 24.68% | +5.52% |
ITB vs. FTXR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FTXR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITB vs. FTXR - Dividend Comparison
ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than FTXR's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXR First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF | 0.98% | 1.52% | 2.13% | 1.50% | 2.38% | 0.67% | 0.33% | 1.34% | 1.74% | 1.18% | 0.24% | 0.00% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.68% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITB and FTXR have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITB has higher volatility (8.79%) compared to FTXR (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITB dropped -86.53% vs FTXR's -52.06%.
On 5-year performance, FTXR leads with 8.30% vs 6.57% for ITB. On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, FTXR has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTXR has performed better with a 8.30% return vs 6.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXR.
FTXR has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.68% for ITB.
ITB is categorized as Building & Construction, while FTXR is Industrials Equities. ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while FTXR tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Transportation Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ITB and 0.60% for FTXR.
FTXR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITB and FTXR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer