ITB vs. AIPO
ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) and AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) are both Building & Construction funds - ITB tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index while AIPO tracks the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ITB charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIPO.
Performance
ITB vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 49.55% return.
ITB
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 7.17%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 5.88%
- 3Y*
- 6.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 14.54%
AIPO
- 1D
- -4.86%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 49.55%
- 6M
- 45.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITB vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 1.43% | -3.19% |
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 49.55% | 9.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITB and AIPO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.25 |
ITB vs. AIPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITB
AIPO
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
ITB
AIPO
-
Industrials
ITB
AIPO
Basic Materials
ITB
AIPO
-
Real Estate
ITB
AIPO
Communication Services
ITB
-
AIPO
Consumer Defensive
ITB
-
AIPO
-
Energy
ITB
-
AIPO
Financial Services
ITB
-
AIPO
Healthcare
ITB
-
AIPO
-
Technology
ITB
-
AIPO
Utilities
ITB
-
AIPO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITB vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank
ITB
AIPO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ITB vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITB | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.43 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITB vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and AIPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITB | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -17.31% | -69.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.11% | -4.86% | -18.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.06% | -4.44% | -32.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.67% | — | — |
Volatility
ITB vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITB | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.94% | 35.59% | -5.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.37% | 35.59% | -6.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.08% | 35.59% | -5.51% |
ITB vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITB vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison
ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.66% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITB and AIPO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ITB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.
ITB has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.
ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ITB and 0.69% for AIPO.
Find the right allocation for ITB and AIPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer