ITAN vs. JHDV
ITAN (Sparkline Intangible Value ETF) and JHDV (John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ITAN returned 21.84%/yr vs 21.99%/yr for JHDV. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ITAN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for JHDV.
Performance
ITAN vs. JHDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITAN achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly lower than JHDV's 19.25% return.
ITAN
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 11.81%
- 6M
- 11.04%
- 1Y
- 32.98%
- 3Y*
- 21.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JHDV
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- YTD
- 19.25%
- 6M
- 18.72%
- 1Y
- 33.01%
- 3Y*
- 21.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITAN vs. JHDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITAN Sparkline Intangible Value ETF | 11.81% | 20.46% | 17.76% | 34.58% | 5.99% |
JHDV John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF | 19.25% | 14.76% | 20.25% | 15.99% | 6.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITAN and JHDV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2022 | 0.89 |
The correlation between ITAN and JHDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITAN vs. JHDV — Risk / Return Rank
ITAN
JHDV
ITAN vs. JHDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) and John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITAN | JHDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.48 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.67 | 4.02 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.64 | 16.43 | -2.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITAN vs. JHDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITAN drawdown since its inception was -30.41%, which is greater than JHDV's maximum drawdown of -18.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITAN and JHDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITAN | JHDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.41% | -18.97% | -11.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -8.26% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.47% | -18.97% | -1.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.97% | -0.63% | -3.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.56% | -2.61% | -4.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 2.01% | +0.41% |
Volatility
ITAN vs. JHDV - Volatility Comparison
Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV) at 4.17%. This indicates that ITAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITAN | JHDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.16% | 4.17% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.06% | 9.48% | +1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.73% | 12.13% | +2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 15.70% | +3.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 15.70% | +3.34% |
ITAN vs. JHDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITAN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JHDV's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITAN vs. JHDV - Dividend Comparison
ITAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than JHDV's 1.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITAN Sparkline Intangible Value ETF | 1.03% | 0.94% | 1.14% | 1.01% | 0.57% | 0.45% |
JHDV John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF | 1.98% | 2.40% | 2.50% | 2.77% | 0.85% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITAN and JHDV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITAN has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to JHDV (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITAN dropped -30.41% vs JHDV's -18.97%.
On 3-year performance, JHDV leads with 21.99% vs 21.84% for ITAN. On fees, JHDV is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, JHDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JHDV has performed better with a 21.99% return vs 21.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHDV is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ITAN.
JHDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 1.03% for ITAN.
They also come from different issuers: Sparkline Capital and John Hancock. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ITAN and 0.34% for JHDV.
JHDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITAN and JHDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer