JHDV vs. FDVV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JHDV (John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by John Hancock, while FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. JHDV is actively managed, while FDVV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JHDV returned 21.41%/yr vs 19.90%/yr for FDVV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JHDV charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.

Performance

JHDV vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHDV achieves a 17.56% return, which is significantly higher than FDVV's 8.39% return.

JHDV

• 1D: -1.41%
• 1M: 1.19%
• YTD: 17.56%
• 6M: 16.88%
• 1Y: 30.01%
• 3Y*: 21.41%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FDVV

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 8.39%
• 6M: 8.10%
• 1Y: 22.16%
• 3Y*: 19.90%
• 5Y*: 13.69%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHDV vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JHDV John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF	17.56%	14.76%	20.25%	15.99%	6.99%
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	8.39%	17.08%	21.81%	18.00%	11.92%

Correlation

The correlation between JHDV and FDVV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2022	0.92

The correlation between JHDV and FDVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JHDV vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHDV

JHDV Risk / Return Rank: 80
JHDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
JHDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
JHDV Omega Ratio Rank: 80
JHDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
JHDV Martin Ratio Rank: 81

FDVV

FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 64
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHDV vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JHDV	FDVV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	2.19	+0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.34	3.06	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.40	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.65	2.39	+1.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.91	9.89	+5.01

JHDV vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHDV and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JHDV vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHDV drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHDV and FDVV.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHDV	FDVV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.97%	-40.25%	+21.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.26%	-9.30%	+1.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.97%	-15.90%	-3.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.03%	-1.31%	-0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.61%	-3.79%	+1.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	2.24%	-0.22%

Volatility

JHDV vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 3.09%. This indicates that JHDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHDV	FDVV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.43%	3.09%	+1.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.60%	8.26%	+1.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.20%	10.15%	+2.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.71%	14.73%	+0.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.71%	16.97%	-1.26%

JHDV vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHDV has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHDV vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

JHDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than FDVV's 2.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	2.86%	2.89%	2.94%	3.77%	3.44%	2.70%	3.19%	3.93%	4.05%	3.66%	1.04%
JHDV John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF	2.01%	2.40%	2.50%	2.77%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHDV and FDVV in my portfolio?

JHDV and FDVV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JHDV or FDVV?

JHDV has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to FDVV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHDV dropped -18.97% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

Which ETF is better, JHDV or FDVV?

On 3-year performance, JHDV leads with 21.41% vs 19.90% for FDVV. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JHDV or FDVV?

Over the 3-year period, JHDV has performed better with a 21.41% return vs 19.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JHDV or FDVV?

FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for JHDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JHDV or FDVV?

FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 2.01% for JHDV.

What is the main difference between JHDV and FDVV?

JHDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for JHDV and 0.29% for FDVV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JHDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.