ITA vs. PHO
ITA (iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF) and PHO (Invesco Water Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index, while PHO is a Water Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ITA returned 15.34%/yr vs 11.71%/yr for PHO. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ITA charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PHO.
Performance
ITA vs. PHO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITA achieves a 8.97% return, which is significantly higher than PHO's -4.97% return. Over the past 10 years, ITA has outperformed PHO with an annualized return of 15.34%, while PHO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.71% annualized return.
ITA
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- 8.97%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 30.42%
- 3Y*
- 27.30%
- 5Y*
- 16.86%
- 10Y*
- 15.34%
PHO
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- -4.97%
- 6M
- -6.44%
- 1Y
- -1.80%
- 3Y*
- 7.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.17%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
ITA vs. PHO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 8.97% | 48.64% | 15.81% | 14.33% | 9.96% | 9.39% | -13.57% | 30.51% | -7.22% | 35.24% |
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | -4.97% | 7.62% | 8.59% | 18.85% | -14.86% | 31.28% | 20.83% | 37.57% | -6.40% | 23.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITA and PHO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ITA and PHO has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ITA vs. PHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITA
PHO
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
ITA
PHO
Technology
ITA
PHO
Basic Materials
ITA
-
PHO
Communication Services
ITA
-
PHO
-
Consumer Cyclical
ITA
-
PHO
-
Consumer Defensive
ITA
-
PHO
-
Energy
ITA
-
PHO
-
Financial Services
ITA
-
PHO
Healthcare
ITA
-
PHO
Real Estate
ITA
-
PHO
-
Utilities
ITA
-
PHO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITA vs. PHO — Risk / Return Rank
ITA
PHO
ITA vs. PHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITA | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.98 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | -0.23 | +2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.20 | -0.58 | +5.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITA vs. PHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITA drawdown since its inception was -59.72%, which is greater than PHO's maximum drawdown of -55.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITA and PHO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITA | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.72% | -55.62% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.82% | -13.78% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.82% | -19.19% | +3.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.72% | -28.60% | +9.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.00% | -34.92% | -16.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.64% | -10.21% | +3.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -10.18% | +0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.97% | 5.59% | +0.38% |
Volatility
ITA vs. PHO - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) at 4.41%. This indicates that ITA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITA | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.07% | 4.41% | +4.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.47% | 11.15% | +7.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.74% | 15.12% | +6.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 18.40% | +1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 19.46% | +3.76% |
ITA vs. PHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITA has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than PHO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITA vs. PHO - Dividend Comparison
ITA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than PHO's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.85% | 0.93% | 0.95% | 0.82% | 1.07% | 1.54% | 1.13% | 0.91% | 1.07% | 1.04% |
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | 0.58% | 0.54% | 0.45% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.34% | 0.47% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITA and PHO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITA has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to PHO (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITA dropped -59.72% vs PHO's -55.62%.
On 10-year performance, ITA leads with 15.34% vs 11.71% for PHO. On fees, ITA is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, PHO has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITA has performed better with a 15.34% return vs 11.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITA is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PHO.
PHO has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.46% for ITA.
ITA is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while PHO is Water Equities. ITA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index, while PHO tracks NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ITA and 0.60% for PHO.
ITA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITA and PHO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer