PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISWN vs. BLOK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ISWN vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ISWN vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
0.94%23.23%-3.96%8.19%-24.93%0.44%
BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
-12.45%32.64%53.12%99.62%-62.36%18.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISWN achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly higher than BLOK's -12.45% return.


ISWN

1D
2.06%
1M
-6.89%
YTD
0.94%
6M
3.42%
1Y
15.90%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*

BLOK

1D
5.17%
1M
-6.86%
YTD
-12.45%
6M
-25.18%
1Y
36.00%
3Y*
40.50%
5Y*
1.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ISWN vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISWN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOK's 0.71% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ISWN vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISWN
ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

BLOK
BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISWN vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISWNBLOKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.35

0.85

+0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.86

1.41

+0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.17

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

0.95

+0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.68

2.35

+4.34

ISWN vs. BLOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISWN Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the BLOK Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISWN and BLOK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISWNBLOKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

0.85

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.04

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.39

-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between ISWN and BLOK is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ISWN vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison

ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than BLOK's 0.82% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
2.91%2.89%3.27%2.91%2.00%0.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
0.82%0.72%6.00%1.15%0.00%14.31%1.88%2.05%1.30%

Drawdowns

ISWN vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISWN drawdown since its inception was -32.35%, smaller than the maximum BLOK drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISWN and BLOK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ISWNBLOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.35%

-73.33%

+40.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

-35.64%

+26.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.35%

-73.33%

+40.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.11%

-32.31%

+25.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.57%

-26.27%

+9.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

14.44%

-12.12%

Volatility

ISWN vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) is 6.13%, while Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) has a volatility of 13.57%. This indicates that ISWN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ISWNBLOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.13%

13.57%

-7.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.60%

31.07%

-22.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.81%

42.50%

-30.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.47%

42.93%

-31.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.40%

39.06%

-27.66%