ISWN vs. BATT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ISWN (Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF) and BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISWN is a Options Trading fund tracking the S-Network International BlackSwan, while BATT is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Amplify. ISWN is passively managed, while BATT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISWN returned -0.37%/yr vs 3.45%/yr for BATT. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISWN charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BATT.

Performance

ISWN vs. BATT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISWN achieves a 4.28% return, which is significantly lower than BATT's 26.16% return.

ISWN

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 2.01%
• YTD: 4.28%
• 6M: 4.94%
• 1Y: 13.27%
• 3Y*: 8.12%
• 5Y*: -0.37%
• 10Y*: —

BATT

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: 4.50%
• YTD: 26.16%
• 6M: 29.61%
• 1Y: 103.56%
• 3Y*: 14.36%
• 5Y*: 3.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISWN vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF	4.28%	23.23%	-3.96%	8.19%	-24.93%	0.44%
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	26.16%	59.70%	-13.93%	-7.05%	-32.25%	-1.06%

Correlation

The correlation between ISWN and BATT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021	0.51

The correlation between ISWN and BATT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISWN vs. BATT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ISWN	BATT
Industrials	19.8%	16.9%
Healthcare	10.6%	-
Technology	10.3%	5.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	18.9%
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	-
Basic Materials	5.9%	57.0%
Communication Services	4.5%	0.0%
Energy	4.0%	-
Utilities	4.0%	-
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Financial Services	1.6%	0.0%

Return for Risk

ISWN vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISWN

ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 30
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 30
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 32

BATT

BATT Risk / Return Rank: 87
BATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
BATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
BATT Omega Ratio Rank: 82
BATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
BATT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISWN vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ISWN	BATT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	3.38	-2.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	3.69	-2.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.50	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	6.12	-4.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.67	22.20	-17.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISWN vs. BATT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISWN Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the BATT Sharpe Ratio of 3.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISWN and BATT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ISWN	BATT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	3.38	-2.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	0.12	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	0.01	0.00

Drawdowns

ISWN vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISWN drawdown since its inception was -32.35%, smaller than the maximum BATT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISWN and BATT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISWN	BATT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.35%	-69.38%	+37.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.63%	-17.03%	+7.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.77%	-47.65%	+33.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.35%	-61.98%	+29.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.03%	-3.44%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.17%	-34.78%	+18.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.85%	4.68%	-1.83%

Volatility

ISWN vs. BATT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) is 4.67%, while Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) has a volatility of 10.29%. This indicates that ISWN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISWN	BATT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.67%	10.29%	-5.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.10%	24.67%	-14.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.20%	30.80%	-18.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.67%	29.57%	-17.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.57%	30.60%	-19.03%

ISWN vs. BATT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISWN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BATT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISWN vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison

ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than BATT's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	1.47%	1.85%	3.17%	3.23%	4.14%	2.32%	0.21%	3.22%	0.89%
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF	2.82%	2.89%	3.27%	2.91%	2.00%	0.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISWN and BATT in my portfolio?

ISWN and BATT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISWN or BATT?

BATT has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to ISWN (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISWN dropped -32.35% vs BATT's -69.38%.

Which ETF is better, ISWN or BATT?

On 5-year performance, BATT leads with 3.45% vs -0.37% for ISWN. On fees, ISWN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, ISWN has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ISWN or BATT?

Over the 5-year period, BATT has performed better with a 3.45% return vs -0.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISWN or BATT?

ISWN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BATT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ISWN or BATT?

ISWN has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 1.47% for BATT.

What is the main difference between ISWN and BATT?

ISWN is categorized as Options Trading, while BATT is Commodity Producers Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ISWN and 0.59% for BATT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.